RE QUANG XIN LEE

RE QUANG XIN LEE

Application dismissed: no appeal had been lodged against the bankruptcy order within the 28‑day time limit, the appeal was already stayed by operation of law, trustees had been appointed and the order had been gazetted so a general stay would prejudice creditors and impede estate administration, and the applicant's grounds were not shown to be sufficiently arguable to justify a stay.

Citation
RE QUANG XIN LEE
Parties
Petitioners: JEBSEN; Debtor/bankrupt: Mr Lee; Trustees in Bankruptcy: Joint and Several Trustees
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
13 October 2016
Case Number
HCB3769/2016
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Petition (stay Application) / Application to Stay Bankruptcy Order Pending Appeal After Bankruptcy Order Made
Outcome
Application dismissed; no stay granted
Legal Topics
Stay of Proceedings, Stay Pending Appeal, Trustees' Duties and Powers, Costs Assessment
Source Language
EN
Bankruptcy Civil Procedure Stay of Proceedings Stay Pending Appeal Trustees' Duties and Powers Costs Assessment

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 7 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

JEBSEN

Petitioners

Mr Lee

Debtor/bankrupt

Joint and Several Trustees

Trustees in Bankruptcy

Procedural Posture

Bankruptcy Petition (stay Application) / Application to Stay Bankruptcy Order Pending Appeal After Bankruptcy Order Made

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a stay of the bankruptcy order should be granted pending an appeal (not an appeal against the bankruptcy order itself)
  2. 2 Whether steps in the bankruptcy process (eg gazetting/advertising) should be stayed
  3. 3 Whether the appeal is bona fide and sufficiently arguable to justify a stay

Ratio Decidendi

Application dismissed: no appeal had been lodged against the bankruptcy order within the 28‑day time limit, the appeal was already stayed by operation of law, trustees had been appointed and the order had been gazetted so a general stay would prejudice creditors and impede estate administration, and the applicant's grounds were not shown to be sufficiently arguable to justify a stay.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed; no stay granted

Orders

  • Application dismissed
  • Costs to be paid to the Petitioners and the Trustees