HUA HAN HEALTH INDUSTRY HOLDINGS HOLDING LTD v. HAW PAR PHARMACEUTICALS HOLDINGS PTE LTD

HUA HAN HEALTH INDUSTRY HOLDINGS HOLDING LTD v. HAW PAR PHARMACEUTICALS HOLDINGS PTE LTD

Leave to appeal was refused because the judge was bound by established Hong Kong Court of Appeal authority endorsing the Comtowell line and the proposed grounds of appeal raised points not previously argued at first instance and lacked reasonable prospects of success; no sufficient interest of justice reason existed to grant leave.

Citation
[2019] HKCFI 2032
Parties
Applicant (company): Hua Han Health Industry Holdings Limited; Respondent (contributory/shareholder): Haw Par Pharmaceuticals Holdings Pte Ltd
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
26 July 2019
Case Number
HCCW110/2019
Procedural Posture
Companies (winding Up) Proceedings / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Substitution and Provisional Liquidators Orders (interlocutory)
Outcome
Leave to appeal refused
Legal Topics
Substitution of Petitioner, Provisional Liquidators, Leave to Appeal, Public Interest Winding Up, Tangible Interest of Contributory, Derivative Action and Unfair Prejudice as Alternative Remedies, Costs Summary Assessment
Source Language
EN
Company Law Insolvency Law Civil Procedure Appellate Procedure Substitution of Petitioner Provisional Liquidators Leave to Appeal Public Interest Winding Up +3 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Hua Han Health Industry Holdings Limited

Applicant (company)

Haw Par Pharmaceuticals Holdings Pte Ltd

Respondent (contributory/shareholder)

Procedural Posture

Companies (winding Up) Proceedings / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Substitution and Provisional Liquidators Orders (interlocutory)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a need for investigation alone suffices to justify winding up on a contributory's petition
  2. 2 Whether private litigants may invoke public interest grounds for winding up
  3. 3 Whether derivative action or unfair prejudice proceedings constitute adequate alternative remedies to winding up

Ratio Decidendi

Leave to appeal was refused because the judge was bound by established Hong Kong Court of Appeal authority endorsing the Comtowell line and the proposed grounds of appeal raised points not previously argued at first instance and lacked reasonable prospects of success; no sufficient interest of justice reason existed to grant leave.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal refused

Orders

  • Leave to appeal refused
  • Interim stay extended for a further seven days to permit the company to renew its application for leave to appeal