HU SUN IRENE AND ANOTHER v. ZISHANG TRADING LTD AND OTHERS
The 19th Defendant's contemporaneous transactional evidence (payment proof, invoice, collection documents, bank activity and WhatsApp communications) made its pleaded defence of a bona fide arms-length purchase believable; there was no compelling indisputable evidence to defeat that defence on summary judgment, therefore the Master's summary judgment was set aside and conditional leave to defend was granted subject to the HK$1,600,000 remaining in court; costs orders were reserved accordingly.
- Citation
- [2023] HKCFI 1612
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: HU SUN IRENE; 2nd Plaintiff: HESSLE INC; 1st Defendant: ZISHANG TRADING LIMITED; 2nd Defendant: Yianda Trading Co., Limited; 3rd Defendant: Wan Chunyan; 4th Defendant: Tang Yu-Cheng; 5th Defendant: Hong Cheng-Wei; 6th Defendant: Chu Jia-Yu; 7th Defendant: Haitaxi Company Limited; 8th Defendant: Yumei Metallic Technology Company Limited; 9th Defendant: Account Holder of Bank of China (Hong Kong) Limited WITH ACCOUNT NO. 89800158546; 10th Defendant: Mi Li Hua; 11th Defendant: Yang Li-Juan; 12th Defendant: Chan Yuen Shan; 13th Defendant: Shi Rong; 14th Defendant: Ye Penghui; 15th Defendant: Tieliefu; 16th Defendant: Tao Yuxiu; 17th Defendant: Hong Kong Superior Cloud E-Commerce Co., Limited; 18th Defendant: Gu Zhen; 19th Defendant: TIAN CHENG TRANDING CO.; 20th Defendant: Hong Kong Senlin Trading Company Limited; 21st Defendant: Good Wealthy International Limited; 22nd Defendant: USA King Tin Medical Company Limited; 23rd Defendant: Liu Peiguo; 24th Defendant: Gain Glory Investment Limited; 25th Defendant: Hong Kong Tianjin Trading Limited; 26th Defendant: Shi Yupan; 27th Defendant: HK Wukong Trading Limited; 28th Defendant: Liu Xiangbo; 29th Defendant: Wang Runqiang; 30th Defendant: Zhao Qifeng; 31st Defendant: Jiang Jiaqi; 32nd Defendant: Chen Yitian; 33rd Defendant: Sinofood Industries Co. Limited; 34th Defendant: Hid Asia Pacific Limited; 35th Defendant: Ever Digital Limited; 36th Defendant: Zuellig Pharma Limited; 37th Defendant: Yuk Entertainment Limited; 38th Defendant: Starpride Trading Ltd; 39th Defendant: Park Hyatt (HK) Development Co Ltd; 40th Defendant: Dragon Hero International Bussiness Consultant LimITED; 41st Defendant: Dewu Limited; 42nd Defendant: Liu Dongmei; 43rd Defendant: Maitong Silk (HK) Limited; 44th Defendant: Go Top High-Tech Company Limited; 45th Defendant: HK Yuanheng Industrial Co., Limited; 46th Defendant: Mu Feng International Limited; 47th Defendant: Granhow Limited; 48th Defendant: Zhu Yongqing; 49th Defendant: HK Bairuiyuan Trading Co., Limited; 50th Defendant: Kaisen International Co., Limited; 51st Defendant: Tjss E-Commerce Co. Limited; 52nd Defendant: Hitonecap Limited; 53rd Defendant: Zhao Hong
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 21 June 2023
- Case Number
- HCA1182/2021
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Claim for Recovery of Defrauded Funds / Appeal From Master's Summary Judgment (application for Summary Judgment to Be Heard Afresh)
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; Master's Order and judgment dated 6 February 2023 set aside; conditional leave to 19th Defendant to defend granted subject to conditions; costs directed as below.
- Legal Topics
- Summary Judgment Under Order 14, Bona Fide Purchaser for Value Without Notice, Mareva Injunction, Bank Transfers and Tracing, Leave to Defend, Costs
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
HU SUN IRENE
1st Plaintiff
HESSLE INC
2nd Plaintiff
ZISHANG TRADING LIMITED
1st Defendant
Yianda Trading Co., Limited
2nd Defendant
Wan Chunyan
3rd Defendant
Tang Yu-Cheng
4th Defendant
Hong Cheng-Wei
5th Defendant
Chu Jia-Yu
6th Defendant
Haitaxi Company Limited
7th Defendant
Yumei Metallic Technology Company Limited
8th Defendant
Account Holder of Bank of China (Hong Kong) Limited WITH ACCOUNT NO. 89800158546
9th Defendant
Mi Li Hua
10th Defendant
Yang Li-Juan
11th Defendant
Chan Yuen Shan
12th Defendant
Shi Rong
13th Defendant
Ye Penghui
14th Defendant
Tieliefu
15th Defendant
Tao Yuxiu
16th Defendant
Hong Kong Superior Cloud E-Commerce Co., Limited
17th Defendant
Gu Zhen
18th Defendant
TIAN CHENG TRANDING CO.
19th Defendant
Hong Kong Senlin Trading Company Limited
20th Defendant
Good Wealthy International Limited
21st Defendant
USA King Tin Medical Company Limited
22nd Defendant
Liu Peiguo
23rd Defendant
Gain Glory Investment Limited
24th Defendant
Hong Kong Tianjin Trading Limited
25th Defendant
Shi Yupan
26th Defendant
HK Wukong Trading Limited
27th Defendant
Liu Xiangbo
28th Defendant
Wang Runqiang
29th Defendant
Zhao Qifeng
30th Defendant
Jiang Jiaqi
31st Defendant
Chen Yitian
32nd Defendant
Sinofood Industries Co. Limited
33rd Defendant
Hid Asia Pacific Limited
34th Defendant
Ever Digital Limited
35th Defendant
Zuellig Pharma Limited
36th Defendant
Yuk Entertainment Limited
37th Defendant
Starpride Trading Ltd
38th Defendant
Park Hyatt (HK) Development Co Ltd
39th Defendant
Dragon Hero International Bussiness Consultant LimITED
40th Defendant
Dewu Limited
41st Defendant
Liu Dongmei
42nd Defendant
Maitong Silk (HK) Limited
43rd Defendant
Go Top High-Tech Company Limited
44th Defendant
HK Yuanheng Industrial Co., Limited
45th Defendant
Mu Feng International Limited
46th Defendant
Granhow Limited
47th Defendant
Zhu Yongqing
48th Defendant
HK Bairuiyuan Trading Co., Limited
49th Defendant
Kaisen International Co., Limited
50th Defendant
Tjss E-Commerce Co. Limited
51st Defendant
Hitonecap Limited
52nd Defendant
Zhao Hong
53rd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Claim for Recovery of Defrauded Funds / Appeal From Master's Summary Judgment (application for Summary Judgment to Be Heard Afresh)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 19th Defendant has a real or bona fide defence as a purchaser for value without notice
- 2 Whether summary judgment under Order 14 should be granted or whether leave to defend should be given
- 3 Whether to impose conditions when granting leave to defend
Ratio Decidendi
The 19th Defendant's contemporaneous transactional evidence (payment proof, invoice, collection documents, bank activity and WhatsApp communications) made its pleaded defence of a bona fide arms-length purchase believable; there was no compelling indisputable evidence to defeat that defence on summary judgment, therefore the Master's summary judgment was set aside and conditional leave to defend was granted subject to the HK$1,600,000 remaining in court; costs orders were reserved accordingly.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; Master's Order and judgment dated 6 February 2023 set aside; conditional leave to 19th Defendant to defend granted subject to conditions; costs directed as below.
Orders
- Master's Order and judgment dated 6 February 2023 set aside
- Conditional leave granted to the 19th Defendant to defend provided the sum of HK$1,600,000 previously paid into court by the 19th Defendant remains in court
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment