ONG AI MOI AND ANOTHER v. CHAN CHI SHING AND OTHERS
The judge found the tenancy had expired and the defendants had no valid basis to occupy the property, the expiry did not need to be pleaded in a trespass claim, and the proposed grounds did not show a reasonable prospect of success; accordingly leave to appeal and a stay of execution were refused.
- Citation
- ONG AI MOI AND ANOTHER v. CHAN CHI SHING AND OTHERS
- Parties
- Plaintiff; 3rd Defendant (counterclaim): ONG AI MOI; Plaintiff; 3rd Defendant (counterclaim): TAN MARY; 1st Defendant: CHAN CHI SHING; 2nd Defendant; 1st Plaintiff (counterclaim): SIT HING WAH; 3rd Defendant; 2nd Plaintiff (counterclaim): HONG KONG HEALTH CARE ASSOCIATION ON AGING LIMITED; 2nd Defendant (counterclaim): KAN KIT
- Court
- District Court
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 1 November 2010
- Case Number
- DCCJ6584/2002
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Action Possession/trespass / Application for Leave to Appeal and Stay of Execution Following Summary Judgment and Order of Possession
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed; application for stay of execution dismissed; costs to the plaintiffs with certificate for counsel; order absolute.
- Legal Topics
- Trespass, Tenancy Agreement, Summary Judgment, Leave to Appeal, Stay of Execution, Pleading
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
ONG AI MOI
Plaintiff; 3rd Defendant (counterclaim)
TAN MARY
Plaintiff; 3rd Defendant (counterclaim)
CHAN CHI SHING
1st Defendant
SIT HING WAH
2nd Defendant; 1st Plaintiff (counterclaim)
HONG KONG HEALTH CARE ASSOCIATION ON AGING LIMITED
3rd Defendant; 2nd Plaintiff (counterclaim)
KAN KIT
2nd Defendant (counterclaim)
Procedural Posture
Civil Action Possession/trespass / Application for Leave to Appeal and Stay of Execution Following Summary Judgment and Order of Possession
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether to grant leave to appeal against summary judgment and order of possession
- 2 Whether expiry of the tenancy agreement affected the trespass claim and required amendment to pleadings
- 3 Whether the plaintiffs relied on a new cause of action accruing after the writ
Ratio Decidendi
The judge found the tenancy had expired and the defendants had no valid basis to occupy the property, the expiry did not need to be pleaded in a trespass claim, and the proposed grounds did not show a reasonable prospect of success; accordingly leave to appeal and a stay of execution were refused.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal dismissed; application for stay of execution dismissed; costs to the plaintiffs with certificate for counsel; order absolute.
Orders
- Dismissed application for leave to appeal by the 2nd and 3rd defendants
- Dismissed application for a stay of execution
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment