RE LAM LAM
The debtor failed to produce evidence establishing a substantial dispute as to the judgment debt, therefore the bankruptcy order should be granted; mere allegations of cross-claims or counterclaims in separate proceedings without substantive evidence do not prevent the making of a bankruptcy order.
- Citation
- RE LAM LAM
- Parties
- Judgment Creditor: Bank of China (Hong Kong) Limited; Debtor: Lam Lam; Official Receiver: Official Receiver
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 15 October 2002
- Case Number
- HCB14221/2002
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy Petition / First Instance Judgment
- Outcome
- Bankruptcy order made against Madam Lam
- Legal Topics
- Undisputed Judgment Debt, Cross Claim, Substantial Grounds to Dispute Debt, Costs
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bank of China (Hong Kong) Limited
Judgment Creditor
Lam Lam
Debtor
Official Receiver
Official Receiver
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Petition / First Instance Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the judgment debt is disputed on substantial grounds
- 2 Whether the debtor's alleged cross-claim prevents a bankruptcy order
- 3 Whether the evidence filed by the debtor meets the legal threshold to oppose the petition
Ratio Decidendi
The debtor failed to produce evidence establishing a substantial dispute as to the judgment debt, therefore the bankruptcy order should be granted; mere allegations of cross-claims or counterclaims in separate proceedings without substantive evidence do not prevent the making of a bankruptcy order.
Court Disposition
Bankruptcy order made against Madam Lam
Orders
- Bankruptcy order made against the debtor (Madam Lam)
- Bankruptcy order made with costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment