NG WAI SANG AND ANOTHER v. HO PO YENG AND OTHERS
Court found a continuing mutual understanding since incorporation that shareholders would participate in management (quasi-partnership); petitioners were unfairly and prejudicially excluded from management and the supplier notices were prejudicial; petitioners' subsequent conduct did not cause the breakdown in trust and confidence; winding up was refused and equitable relief was granted by ordering the 1st to 4th respondents to purchase the petitioners' shares, with costs ordered against the 1st to 4th respondents.
- Citation
- NG WAI SANG AND ANOTHER v. HO PO YENG AND OTHERS
- Parties
- 1st Petitioner: NG WAI SANG; 2nd Petitioner: KWONG LAP WAI; 1st Respondent: HO PO YENG; 2nd Respondent (deceased; Personal Representative Madam Lau Chun Substituted): HO WAI MAN; 3rd Respondent: HO MING CHUN; 4th Respondent: HO HIN MING; 5th Respondent (the Company): HANG SANG ENGINEERING FACTORY LIMITED
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 20 March 2007
- Case Number
- HCCW456/2005
- Procedural Posture
- Companies (winding Up) Petition Under Companies Ordinance S168 a and Just and Equitable Ground / Final Judgment of Court of First Instance Delivered 20 March 2007
- Outcome
- Petition dismissed insofar as winding up sought; order nisi made for buy-out of petitioners' shares by 1st to 4th respondents; costs ordered against 1st to 4th respondents.
- Legal Topics
- Unfairly Prejudicial Conduct, Just and Equitable Winding Up, Section 168 a Buy Out Relief, Minority Shareholder Protection, Quasi Partnership
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
NG WAI SANG
1st Petitioner
KWONG LAP WAI
2nd Petitioner
HO PO YENG
1st Respondent
HO WAI MAN
2nd Respondent (deceased; Personal Representative Madam Lau Chun Substituted)
HO MING CHUN
3rd Respondent
HO HIN MING
4th Respondent
HANG SANG ENGINEERING FACTORY LIMITED
5th Respondent (the Company)
Procedural Posture
Companies (winding Up) Petition Under Companies Ordinance S168 a and Just and Equitable Ground / Final Judgment of Court of First Instance Delivered 20 March 2007
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a mutual understanding existed that shareholders would participate in management (quasi-partnership)
- 2 Whether respondents' conduct was unfair and prejudicial under s168A/just and equitable
- 3 Whether petitioners' conduct destroyed mutual trust and confidence (clean hands)
Ratio Decidendi
Court found a continuing mutual understanding since incorporation that shareholders would participate in management (quasi-partnership); petitioners were unfairly and prejudicially excluded from management and the supplier notices were prejudicial; petitioners' subsequent conduct did not cause the breakdown in trust and confidence; winding up was refused and equitable relief was granted by ordering the 1st to 4th respondents to purchase the petitioners' shares, with costs ordered against the 1st to 4th respondents.
Court Disposition
Petition dismissed insofar as winding up sought; order nisi made for buy-out of petitioners' shares by 1st to 4th respondents; costs ordered against 1st to 4th respondents.
Orders
- Order nisi that 1st to 4th respondents purchase the shares of the petitioners in Hang Sang Engineering Factory Limited
- Leave to parties to restore the hearing for consequential directions (estimated two hours); parties to file draft directions three days before restoration
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment