張才奎所託管中國山水投資有限公司股份 AND ANOTHER v. 張才奎 AND ANOTHER

張才奎所託管中國山水投資有限公司股份 AND ANOTHER v. 張才奎 AND ANOTHER

On a qualitative assessment of the risk of jeopardy based on the evidence, including intimidation campaigns, suspicious transactions and unexplained cash movements, the receivers acted within the scope of the court's orders to protect the claimed beneficiaries and the company's sole asset (its holding in Shanshui Cement); appointment of independent non‑executive directors was a proper exercise of those protective powers and the 1st defendant's interlocutory application to restrain the receivers and invalidate those appointments was dismissed.

Citation
張才奎所託管中國山水投資有限公司股份 AND ANOTHER v. 張才奎 AND ANOTHER
Parties
Plaintiffs: Relevant employees whose shares in China Shanshui Investment Company Limited held by ZHANG CAIKUI on trust (1st Group); Plaintiffs: Relevant employees whose shares in China Shanshui Investment Company Limited held by LI YANMIN on trust (2nd Group); 1st Defendant: ZHANG CAIKUI; 2nd Defendant: LI YANMIN
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
9 October 2015
Case Number
HCA2191/2014
Procedural Posture
Company/shareholder Derivative and Trust Dispute With Receivership and Injunction Applications / Interlocutory — Application by 1st Defendant to Restrain Court‑appointed Receivers and to Reverse Appointment of Independent Directors; Refusal at First Instance
Outcome
Defendant's application dismissed
Legal Topics
Unfair Prejudice, Constructive Trust Vs Discretionary Trust, Statutory Derivative Action (companies Ordinance), Appointment and Powers of Receivers, Validity of Board and Director Appointments, Contempt and Interference With Officers of the Court, Forgery/intimidation of Witnesses and Misconduct by Solicitors
Source Language
EN
Company Law Trusts Injunctions Receivership Civil Procedure Criminal Intimidation/obstruction Allegations Unfair Prejudice Constructive Trust Vs Discretionary Trust +5 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 13
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Relevant employees whose shares in China Shanshui Investment Company Limited held by ZHANG CAIKUI on trust (1st Group)

Plaintiffs

Relevant employees whose shares in China Shanshui Investment Company Limited held by LI YANMIN on trust (2nd Group)

Plaintiffs

ZHANG CAIKUI

1st Defendant

LI YANMIN

2nd Defendant

Procedural Posture

Company/shareholder Derivative and Trust Dispute With Receivership and Injunction Applications / Interlocutory — Application by 1st Defendant to Restrain Court‑appointed Receivers and to Reverse Appointment of Independent Directors; Refusal at First Instance

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the receivers acted ultra vires in appointing independent non‑executive directors and in exercising powers over Shanshui Investment and its shareholding in Shanshui Cement
  2. 2 Whether the 1st defendant holds the disputed shares on trust for employees or in absolute discretionary trusts
  3. 3 Whether there was a real risk of jeopardy to the trust property justifying receivership and the steps taken by the receivers

Ratio Decidendi

On a qualitative assessment of the risk of jeopardy based on the evidence, including intimidation campaigns, suspicious transactions and unexplained cash movements, the receivers acted within the scope of the court's orders to protect the claimed beneficiaries and the company's sole asset (its holding in Shanshui Cement); appointment of independent non‑executive directors was a proper exercise of those protective powers and the 1st defendant's interlocutory application to restrain the receivers and invalidate those appointments was dismissed.

Court Disposition

Defendant's application dismissed

Orders

  • Refusal of leave to amend the defendant's summons as sought
  • 1st defendant's application to restrain the receivers and to invalidate the appointment of independent non‑executive directors dismissed