LUK PAK CHUEN v. LUK PAK SHING AND OTHERS

LUK PAK CHUEN v. LUK PAK SHING AND OTHERS

The court exercised its discretion to stay the unfair prejudice petitions until judgment in the probate action because the decisive issue — beneficial ownership of the shares — should be determined first in the probate proceedings; the outcome of that determination will determine whether the petitions can succeed.

Citation
LUK PAK CHUEN v. LUK PAK SHING AND OTHERS
Parties
Petitioner: Luk Pak Chuen; 1st Respondent: Luk Pak Shing; 2nd Respondent: Luk Pak Fong Joanna; 3rd Respondent: Personal Representative of the Estate of Wong Yang Fung; 4th Respondent: Luk Pak Wui; 5th Respondent: Teh Feng Shing Company Limited; 5th Respondent (china): Teh Feng Shing (China) Company Limited; 3rd Respondent (in Hccw117): Chu Luk Sui Chau Pawana
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
12 March 2014
Case Number
HCCW116/2012
Procedural Posture
Companies (winding Up) Proceedings Under Section 168 a and 177(1)(f) of the Companies Ordinance (cap 32) / Interlocutory — Application to Strike Out, Stay or Consolidate; Decision on Summons
Outcome
Petitions stayed pending determination of beneficial ownership in the probate action; costs awarded to respondents without certificate for counsel; liberty to apply reserved.
Legal Topics
Unfair Prejudice (section 168 A), Winding Up (section 177(1)(f)), Beneficial Ownership of Shares, Locus to Present Petition, Stay Pending Related Proceedings, Consolidation of Proceedings
Source Language
EN
Company Law Probate Civil Procedure Trusts Unfair Prejudice (section 168 A) Winding Up (section 177(1)(f)) Beneficial Ownership of Shares Locus to Present Petition +2 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Luk Pak Chuen

Petitioner

Luk Pak Shing

1st Respondent

Luk Pak Fong Joanna

2nd Respondent

Personal Representative of the Estate of Wong Yang Fung

3rd Respondent

Luk Pak Wui

4th Respondent

Teh Feng Shing Company Limited

5th Respondent

Teh Feng Shing (China) Company Limited

5th Respondent (china)

Chu Luk Sui Chau Pawana

3rd Respondent (in Hccw117)

Procedural Posture

Companies (winding Up) Proceedings Under Section 168 a and 177(1)(f) of the Companies Ordinance (cap 32) / Interlocutory — Application to Strike Out, Stay or Consolidate; Decision on Summons

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the petitioner is the beneficial owner of the shares transferred in 2004
  2. 2 Whether petitioner has locus to present petitions under section 168A if he is not beneficial owner
  3. 3 Whether the petitions should be struck out, stayed or consolidated pending determination of beneficial ownership in probate proceedings

Ratio Decidendi

The court exercised its discretion to stay the unfair prejudice petitions until judgment in the probate action because the decisive issue — beneficial ownership of the shares — should be determined first in the probate proceedings; the outcome of that determination will determine whether the petitions can succeed.

Court Disposition

Petitions stayed pending determination of beneficial ownership in the probate action; costs awarded to respondents without certificate for counsel; liberty to apply reserved.

Orders

  • HCCW116/2012 and HCCW117/2012 are stayed until the handing down of judgment in the probate action.
  • Liberty to apply for all parties.