RE LEUNG KWAI MAN alias LEUNG MAN
The court was satisfied on the evidence that the statutory condition under section 45(e) of the Trustee Ordinance was met, that the applicant is the beneficial owner of the properties, and that, given the circumstances and authority, the application could properly be heard ex parte; accordingly a vesting order was made in the terms sought.
- Citation
- RE LEUNG KWAI MAN alias LEUNG MAN
- Parties
- Applicant / Beneficiary: Leung Man (also known as Leung Kwai Man); Trustee (registered Owner; Deceased): Leung Chung Yu (also known as Leung Mau Cheong)
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 11 December 2015
- Case Number
- HCMP3193/2014
- Procedural Posture
- HCMP 3193/2014 Miscellaneous Proceedings Under the Trustee Ordinance / Ex Parte Originating Summons for Vesting Order
- Outcome
- Vesting order made in terms of paragraph 2 of the originating summons; no order as to costs.
- Legal Topics
- Vesting Order, Trustee Ordinance S45, Missing Death Certificate, Ex Parte Application
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Leung Man (also known as Leung Kwai Man)
Applicant / Beneficiary
Leung Chung Yu (also known as Leung Mau Cheong)
Trustee (registered Owner; Deceased)
Procedural Posture
HCMP 3193/2014 Miscellaneous Proceedings Under the Trustee Ordinance / Ex Parte Originating Summons for Vesting Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether conditions for a vesting order under section 45(e) Trustee Ordinance Cap.29 are satisfied
- 2 Whether the applicant is beneficially entitled to the properties
- 3 Whether the application may properly be heard ex parte without appointing personal representatives of the deceased trustee
Ratio Decidendi
The court was satisfied on the evidence that the statutory condition under section 45(e) of the Trustee Ordinance was met, that the applicant is the beneficial owner of the properties, and that, given the circumstances and authority, the application could properly be heard ex parte; accordingly a vesting order was made in the terms sought.
Court Disposition
Vesting order made in terms of paragraph 2 of the originating summons; no order as to costs.
Orders
- Order in terms of paragraph 2 of the originating summons vesting The Remaining Portion of Lot No.736 and The Remaining Portion of Lot No.737 in the applicant
- No order as to costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment