RE NG SUA KEA
Because there was no personal representative of the intermediate trustee (Chui Chun Fai) able or willing to possess the legal title and the applicants had acquired the beneficial interest and been in peaceful, uninterrupted possession since 1992, the court concluded that section 45(e) Trustee Ordinance applied and it was appropriate to vest legal title in the applicants as joint tenants.
- Citation
- RE NG SUA KEA
- Parties
- Purchasers/applicants Seeking Vesting Order: Applicants (purchasers); Deceased/former Registered Owner: Ng Sua Kea; Letter of Administration Grantee of Ng Sua Kea (deceased); Intestate Deceased 2003: Chui Chun Fai; Attorney Who Sold the Premises as Attorney of Chui Chun Fai: Chui Yiu Fai; Heir/potential Personal Representative (resides in Vietnam; Did Not Apply for Administration): Surviving spouse of Chui Chun Fai
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 25 January 2017
- Case Number
- HCMP3570/2016
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Vesting Order Under Trustee Ordinance (cap 29) / Ruling (chambers)
- Outcome
- Application granted: vesting order issued; legal title vested in the applicants as joint tenants; no order as to costs.
- Legal Topics
- Vesting Order, Section 45 Trustee Ordinance, Letters of Administration, Title Defect, Intestacy
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Applicants (purchasers)
Purchasers/applicants Seeking Vesting Order
Ng Sua Kea
Deceased/former Registered Owner
Chui Chun Fai
Letter of Administration Grantee of Ng Sua Kea (deceased); Intestate Deceased 2003
Chui Yiu Fai
Attorney Who Sold the Premises as Attorney of Chui Chun Fai
Surviving spouse of Chui Chun Fai
Heir/potential Personal Representative (resides in Vietnam; Did Not Apply for Administration)
Procedural Posture
Application for Vesting Order Under Trustee Ordinance (cap 29) / Ruling (chambers)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether section 45(e) Trustee Ordinance applies where there is no available personal representative of an intermediate administrator
- 2 Whether it is appropriate to vest legal title in applicants who hold the beneficial interest and have been in peaceful possession
- 3 Whether the applicants' equitable interest and unchallenged occupation justify vesting order despite lack of formal administration
Ratio Decidendi
Because there was no personal representative of the intermediate trustee (Chui Chun Fai) able or willing to possess the legal title and the applicants had acquired the beneficial interest and been in peaceful, uninterrupted possession since 1992, the court concluded that section 45(e) Trustee Ordinance applied and it was appropriate to vest legal title in the applicants as joint tenants.
Court Disposition
Application granted: vesting order issued; legal title vested in the applicants as joint tenants; no order as to costs.
Orders
- Vesting order granted to vest the legal title of the subject premises in the applicants as joint tenants pursuant to section 45(e) Trustee Ordinance (Cap 29).
- There be no order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment