中國遠洋運輸(集團)總公司 (前稱中國遠洋運輸總公司) v. WANG HU alias WON SO FOO AND OTHERS
Given the express declarations of trust, proof of ownership of the deferred shares, diligent attempts at service including substituted service, and the trustees' failure to transfer the shares within 28 days of written demand, the court vested in the plaintiff the right to transfer the deferred shares and to receive accrued or accruing dividends pursuant to s52(1)(b)(iii) and (iv) of the Trustee Ordinance and allowed the plaintiff to transfer the shares thereafter.
- Citation
- 中國遠洋運輸(集團)總公司 (前稱中國遠洋運輸總公司) v. WANG HU alias WON SO FOO AND OTHERS
- Parties
- Defendant Trustee: Defendant 1; Defendant Trustee: Defendant 2; Defendant Trustee: Defendant 3; Defendant Trustee: Defendant 4; Defendant Trustee: Defendant 5; Defendant Trustee: Defendant 6; Defendant Trustee: Defendant 7; Defendant Trustee: Defendant 8; Defendant Trustee: Defendant 9
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 18 December 2014
- Case Number
- HCMP852/2014
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under Trustee Ordinance for Vesting of Beneficiary Rights in Respect of Deferred Shares / Hearing on Application for Vesting Orders; Defendants Absent After Substituted Service
- Outcome
- Application granted. Rights to transfer deferred shares and to receive accrued or accruing dividends vested in plaintiff; plaintiff may transfer the shares; no order as to costs.
- Legal Topics
- Vesting Orders Under Trustee Ordinance S52, Substituted Service and Proceeding in Absence S58, Declaration of Trust, Transfer of Shares and Entitlement to Dividends
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Defendant 1
Defendant Trustee
Defendant 2
Defendant Trustee
Defendant 3
Defendant Trustee
Defendant 4
Defendant Trustee
Defendant 5
Defendant Trustee
Defendant 6
Defendant Trustee
Defendant 7
Defendant Trustee
Defendant 8
Defendant Trustee
Defendant 9
Defendant Trustee
Procedural Posture
Application Under Trustee Ordinance for Vesting of Beneficiary Rights in Respect of Deferred Shares / Hearing on Application for Vesting Orders; Defendants Absent After Substituted Service
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trustees had neglected to transfer the shares after written demand under s52(1) of the Trustee Ordinance
- 2 Whether the court could proceed in the absence of the defendants after substituted service under s58
- 3 Whether rights to transfer and accrued dividends should be vested in the plaintiff under s52(1)(b)(iii) and (iv)
Ratio Decidendi
Given the express declarations of trust, proof of ownership of the deferred shares, diligent attempts at service including substituted service, and the trustees' failure to transfer the shares within 28 days of written demand, the court vested in the plaintiff the right to transfer the deferred shares and to receive accrued or accruing dividends pursuant to s52(1)(b)(iii) and (iv) of the Trustee Ordinance and allowed the plaintiff to transfer the shares thereafter.
Court Disposition
Application granted. Rights to transfer deferred shares and to receive accrued or accruing dividends vested in plaintiff; plaintiff may transfer the shares; no order as to costs.
Orders
- The right to transfer the deferred shares registered in the name of each defendant in Ocean Tramping Company, Limited and the right to receive the dividends accrued or to accrue thereon prior to the transfer of the share be vested in the plaintiff.
- The plaintiff may thereafter transfer the shares to itself or to any other person or entity as the plaintiff may desire.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment