SUHAIL & SAUD BAHWAN and Another v. HONG KONG AIR CARGO TERMINALS LTD. and Others
The summons for a preliminary ruling is dismissed because deciding the legal point in advance would not dispose of the action nor produce a clear advantage; therefore all issues should be tried together to conserve court time and costs and to avoid multiplicity of hearings.
- Citation
- SUHAIL & SAUD BAHWAN and Another v. HONG KONG AIR CARGO TERMINALS LTD. and Others
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: SUHAIL & SAUD BAHWAN; Second Plaintiff: INTERGULF EXPRESS (HK) LIMITED; First Defendant: HONG KONG AIR CARGO TERMINALS LIMITED; Second Defendant: CHINA NATIONAL AVIATION CORPORATION; Third Defendant: JAPAN AIR LINES COMPANY; Fourth Defendant: JARDINE AIRPORT SERVICES LIMITED
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 2 October 1995
- Case Number
- HCCL114/1993
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Detinue Action Involving Carriage by Air / Warsaw Convention Limits / Application for Preliminary Issue (summons Seeking to Try Point of Law Before Trial)
- Outcome
- Summons dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Warsaw Convention, Limitation of Liability, Preliminary Issues, Detinue, Agent/servant Liability
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SUHAIL & SAUD BAHWAN
First Plaintiff
INTERGULF EXPRESS (HK) LIMITED
Second Plaintiff
HONG KONG AIR CARGO TERMINALS LIMITED
First Defendant
CHINA NATIONAL AVIATION CORPORATION
Second Defendant
JAPAN AIR LINES COMPANY
Third Defendant
JARDINE AIRPORT SERVICES LIMITED
Fourth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Detinue Action Involving Carriage by Air / Warsaw Convention Limits / Application for Preliminary Issue (summons Seeking to Try Point of Law Before Trial)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a servant or agent of an air carrier sued in detinue may as a matter of law rely on the amended Warsaw Convention (Articles 18,20,21,22,24,25A) to limit liability
- 2 Whether it is appropriate to order a separate preliminary trial of that legal issue prior to the main trial
Ratio Decidendi
The summons for a preliminary ruling is dismissed because deciding the legal point in advance would not dispose of the action nor produce a clear advantage; therefore all issues should be tried together to conserve court time and costs and to avoid multiplicity of hearings.
Court Disposition
Summons dismissed
Orders
- Summons dismissed
- Order nisi that plaintiffs should have their costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment