How Glory Properties Ltd. and Another v. Chinpeak Investment Ltd. and Others
The court accepted the evidence and expert reports that Flat 25-A was the source of the leak and that the plaintiffs suffered quantifiable damage; damages were assessed at HK$468,314, pre-judgment interest was awarded at 1% above prime from writ to judgment, and the 2nd defendant's joint and several liability was limited proportionately to his 15-month occupation out of 39 months resulting in liability of HK$180,121.
- Citation
- How Glory Properties Ltd. and Another v. Chinpeak Investment Ltd. and Others
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: How Glory Properties Limited; 2nd Plaintiff: Li Wing Kin; 1st Defendant: Chinpeak Investment Limited; 2nd Defendant: Leung Ching Man Shirley; 3rd Defendant: Cheng Yin Hing
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 29 June 2001
- Case Number
- HCA11133/1998
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Action Assessment of Damages (follow on to Interlocutory Judgment) / Assessment of Damages (assessment Hearing)
- Outcome
- Judgment for plaintiffs against 1st defendant for HK$468,314; 2nd defendant jointly and severally liable limited to HK$180,121; pre-judgment interest at 1% above prime from date of writ to date of judgment; costs nisi for assessment awarded to plaintiffs against 1st and 2nd defendants, quantum to be taxed if not...
- Legal Topics
- Water Leakage, Damages Assessment, Injunction, Loss of Enjoyment, Pre Judgment Interest, Costs
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
How Glory Properties Limited
1st Plaintiff
Li Wing Kin
2nd Plaintiff
Chinpeak Investment Limited
1st Defendant
Leung Ching Man Shirley
2nd Defendant
Cheng Yin Hing
3rd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Action Assessment of Damages (follow on to Interlocutory Judgment) / Assessment of Damages (assessment Hearing)
Legal Issues
- 1 Liability for water leakage from an upstairs flat causing property damage
- 2 Measure and components of damages for property water damage
- 3 Apportionment of joint and several liability between defendants by period of occupation
Ratio Decidendi
The court accepted the evidence and expert reports that Flat 25-A was the source of the leak and that the plaintiffs suffered quantifiable damage; damages were assessed at HK$468,314, pre-judgment interest was awarded at 1% above prime from writ to judgment, and the 2nd defendant's joint and several liability was limited proportionately to his 15-month occupation out of 39 months resulting in liability of HK$180,121.
Court Disposition
Judgment for plaintiffs against 1st defendant for HK$468,314; 2nd defendant jointly and severally liable limited to HK$180,121; pre-judgment interest at 1% above prime from date of writ to date of judgment; costs nisi for assessment awarded to plaintiffs against 1st and 2nd defendants, quantum to be taxed if not...
Orders
- Judgment for plaintiffs against 1st defendant in the sum of HK$468,314.
- 2nd defendant jointly and severally liable limited to HK$180,121 (HK$468,314 x 15/39).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment