WAH YAN PROPERTY LTD. v. IDEACTION STRATEGIC INVESTMENT LTD. AND ANOTHER
Because the petitioner established an unopposed debt in excess of $20,000,000 and abandoned the just and equitable ground, the court was satisfied the company was insolvent and made a winding-up order under section 177(1)(d) of the Companies Ordinance.
- Citation
- WAH YAN PROPERTY LTD. v. IDEACTION STRATEGIC INVESTMENT LTD. AND ANOTHER
- Parties
- Petitioner: Wah Yan Property Limited; 1st Respondent: Ideaction Strategic Investment Limited; 2nd Respondent: Ideaction Holdings Limited
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 24 September 1999
- Case Number
- HCCW187/1997
- Procedural Posture
- Winding Up Petition Under the Companies Ordinance / Hearing and Judgment (winding Up Order Made)
- Outcome
- Winding-up order made under section 177(1)(d) of the Companies Ordinance
- Legal Topics
- Winding Up, Insolvency, Costs
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Wah Yan Property Limited
Petitioner
Ideaction Strategic Investment Limited
1st Respondent
Ideaction Holdings Limited
2nd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Winding Up Petition Under the Companies Ordinance / Hearing and Judgment (winding Up Order Made)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the company should be wound up as just and equitable (withdrawn)
- 2 Whether the company is insolvent and liable to be wound up on the debt ground
- 3 Allocation of costs in winding-up proceedings
Ratio Decidendi
Because the petitioner established an unopposed debt in excess of $20,000,000 and abandoned the just and equitable ground, the court was satisfied the company was insolvent and made a winding-up order under section 177(1)(d) of the Companies Ordinance.
Court Disposition
Winding-up order made under section 177(1)(d) of the Companies Ordinance
Orders
- The Company (Ideaction Strategic Investment Limited) is to be wound up under section 177(1)(d) of the Companies Ordinance.
- The Official Receiver's costs shall be paid out of the 1st Respondent's assets.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment