RE MEI CHEONG IEONG HONG (H.K.) LTD.
The petitioners, constituting the vast majority by value, held an admitted undisputed debt; no exceptional or persuasive evidence was produced to justify exercising the court's discretion under s.287 to refuse or stay the winding-up petition; accordingly a compulsory winding-up order was required and was made.
- Citation
- RE MEI CHEONG IEONG HONG (H.K.) LTD.
- Parties
- Petitioner/creditor: Standard Chartered Bank; Petitioner/creditor: Jade Riches Investment Limited; Petitioner/creditor: Union Bank of Hong Kong Limited; Petitioner/creditor: The Bank of East Asia Limited; Petitioner/agent of Syndicate: Standard Chartered Asia Limited; Company/respondent: Mei Cheong Ieong Hong (H.K.) Limited; Opposing Contributory/shareholder: Silverdew Development Limited; Creditor/opposing: Mei Cheong Trading Ltd.; Creditor/opposing: Mei Cheong Construction Co. Ltd.
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 8 November 1999
- Case Number
- HCCW375/1999
- Procedural Posture
- Winding Up Petition (companies Ordinance) / Judgment Following Hearing (order Made)
- Outcome
- Compulsory winding-up order made against Mei Cheong Ieong Hong (H.K.) Limited
- Legal Topics
- Winding Up, Creditors' Petition, Court Discretion Under S.287, Provisional Liquidators, Debt Enforcement
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Standard Chartered Bank
Petitioner/creditor
Jade Riches Investment Limited
Petitioner/creditor
Union Bank of Hong Kong Limited
Petitioner/creditor
The Bank of East Asia Limited
Petitioner/creditor
Standard Chartered Asia Limited
Petitioner/agent of Syndicate
Mei Cheong Ieong Hong (H.K.) Limited
Company/respondent
Silverdew Development Limited
Opposing Contributory/shareholder
Mei Cheong Trading Ltd.
Creditor/opposing
Mei Cheong Construction Co. Ltd.
Creditor/opposing
Procedural Posture
Winding Up Petition (companies Ordinance) / Judgment Following Hearing (order Made)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a compulsory winding-up order should be made where debt is admitted
- 2 Whether the court should exercise discretion under s.287 to refuse or stay a winding-up petition despite creditor opposition
- 3 Whether the company can realistically trade out of insolvency given disputes with joint venture partner and nature of asset
Ratio Decidendi
The petitioners, constituting the vast majority by value, held an admitted undisputed debt; no exceptional or persuasive evidence was produced to justify exercising the court's discretion under s.287 to refuse or stay the winding-up petition; accordingly a compulsory winding-up order was required and was made.
Court Disposition
Compulsory winding-up order made against Mei Cheong Ieong Hong (H.K.) Limited
Orders
- Make compulsory winding-up order against Mei Cheong Ieong Hong (H.K.) Limited
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment