Re Portslink Asia Ltd.

Re Portslink Asia Ltd.

The statutory demand was not complied with, the company did not pay the outstanding debt despite promises and an adjournment, and there was no effective representation for the company; therefore the court must make the winding-up order.

Citation
Re Portslink Asia Ltd.
Parties
Petitioner: Petitioner; Company (debtor): Portslink Asia Limited; Official Receiver: Official Receiver
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
4 February 2002
Case Number
HCCW1127/2001
Procedural Posture
Companies (winding Up) Proceedings / Hearing and Judgment on Winding Up Petition
Outcome
Winding-up order made against Portslink Asia Limited
Legal Topics
Winding Up, Statutory Demand, Lease Obligations, Debt Recovery
Source Language
EN

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Petitioner

Petitioner

Portslink Asia Limited

Company (debtor)

Official Receiver

Official Receiver

Procedural Posture

Companies (winding Up) Proceedings / Hearing and Judgment on Winding Up Petition

  1. 1 Whether the company is unable to pay its debts such that a winding-up order should be made
  2. 2 Whether the statutory demand served on 9 July 2001 was complied with
  3. 3 Whether a dispute as to mesne profits prevents the winding-up order

Ratio Decidendi

The statutory demand was not complied with, the company did not pay the outstanding debt despite promises and an adjournment, and there was no effective representation for the company; therefore the court must make the winding-up order.

Court Disposition

Winding-up order made against Portslink Asia Limited

Orders

  • The usual winding-up order is made against Portslink Asia Limited