RE PRESSURE VESSELS MANUFACTURING CO LTD
The court exercised its discretionary power under s.287 to make a winding‑up order because the petitioner had a genuine and legitimate grievance about the appointment and conduct of the provisional liquidator, undermining confidence in his impartiality, and those considerations outweighed the expressed wishes of the majority of creditors to continue the voluntary liquidation.
- Citation
- RE PRESSURE VESSELS MANUFACTURING CO LTD
- Parties
- Petitioner: Standard Chartered Bank; Company: Pressure Vessels Manufacturing Company Limited; Provisional Liquidator: Mr Danvil Chan (K H Chan & Co); Opposing Creditor and Shareholder: Chan Kam Hoo Samson; Opposing Creditor and Shareholder: Chan Kam Chun John; Opposing Creditor: Chan Kong Yin Bing; Creditor: Wing Hang Bank Ltd; Interested Party: Official Receiver
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 9 December 2002
- Case Number
- HCCW1005/2002
- Procedural Posture
- Winding Up Petition (companies Ordinance Cap.32) / Judgment Following Hearing on Petition
- Outcome
- Winding-up order made by the court
- Legal Topics
- Winding Up, Liquidator Appointment and Independence, Voting Rights of Secured Creditors, Third Party Security and Voting, Companies Ordinance S.228 a, Companies Ordinance S.287
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Standard Chartered Bank
Petitioner
Pressure Vessels Manufacturing Company Limited
Company
Mr Danvil Chan (K H Chan & Co)
Provisional Liquidator
Chan Kam Hoo Samson
Opposing Creditor and Shareholder
Chan Kam Chun John
Opposing Creditor and Shareholder
Chan Kong Yin Bing
Opposing Creditor
Wing Hang Bank Ltd
Creditor
Official Receiver
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Winding Up Petition (companies Ordinance Cap.32) / Judgment Following Hearing on Petition
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appointment of the voluntary liquidator should be disturbed by the court
- 2 Whether third‑party securities may be deducted for voting purposes
- 3 Whether the provisional liquidator could act impartially and independently
Ratio Decidendi
The court exercised its discretionary power under s.287 to make a winding‑up order because the petitioner had a genuine and legitimate grievance about the appointment and conduct of the provisional liquidator, undermining confidence in his impartiality, and those considerations outweighed the expressed wishes of the majority of creditors to continue the voluntary liquidation.
Court Disposition
Winding-up order made by the court
Orders
- Company to be wound up by the court
- Petitioner's costs to be paid out of the Company's assets
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment