RE GOLD WO MELAMINE PRODUCT CO LTD
There was no viable restructuring proposal before the court and no evidence of in-principle support from the required statutory majority of creditors; the investor had terminated the earlier restructuring agreement and the Stock Exchange had imposed conditions making resumption unlikely. On that basis the court was satisfied winding-up orders should be made for each company.
- Citation
- RE GOLD WO MELAMINE PRODUCT CO LTD
- Parties
- Petitioner: The Hong Kong and Shanghai Banking Corporation; Provisional Liquidators: Provisional Liquidators; Company (debtor): Gold Wo Melamine Product Company Limited; Company (debtor): Richlink Asia Limited; Company (debtor): Gold Wo International Holdings Limited; Opposing Creditor: Guangdong Keen Lloyd Holdings Limited; Opposing Creditor: Guangdong Winko Investment Limited; Proposed Rescuer: Winko Foundation Limited; Official Receiver: Official Receiver
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 14 June 2004
- Case Number
- HCCW31/2003
- Procedural Posture
- Companies (winding Up) Petitions (hccw Nos.31 33 of 2003) / Final Hearing and Judgment; Winding Up Orders Made
- Outcome
- Winding-up orders made in respect of Gold Wo Melamine Product Company Limited (HCCW No.31/2003), Richlink Asia Limited (HCCW No.32/2003) and Gold Wo International Holdings Limited (HCCW No.33/2003).
- Legal Topics
- Winding Up, Provisional Liquidation, Restructuring Proposals, Creditors' Rights, Demand for Payment, Listing Suspension
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Hong Kong and Shanghai Banking Corporation
Petitioner
Provisional Liquidators
Provisional Liquidators
Gold Wo Melamine Product Company Limited
Company (debtor)
Richlink Asia Limited
Company (debtor)
Gold Wo International Holdings Limited
Company (debtor)
Guangdong Keen Lloyd Holdings Limited
Opposing Creditor
Guangdong Winko Investment Limited
Opposing Creditor
Winko Foundation Limited
Proposed Rescuer
Official Receiver
Official Receiver
Procedural Posture
Companies (winding Up) Petitions (hccw Nos.31 33 of 2003) / Final Hearing and Judgment; Winding Up Orders Made
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether to grant winding-up orders for the three companies
- 2 Whether there exists a viable restructuring/rescue proposal warranting further adjournment
- 3 Whether the requisite support of the statutory majority of creditors exists for any purported rescue
Ratio Decidendi
There was no viable restructuring proposal before the court and no evidence of in-principle support from the required statutory majority of creditors; the investor had terminated the earlier restructuring agreement and the Stock Exchange had imposed conditions making resumption unlikely. On that basis the court was satisfied winding-up orders should be made for each company.
Court Disposition
Winding-up orders made in respect of Gold Wo Melamine Product Company Limited (HCCW No.31/2003), Richlink Asia Limited (HCCW No.32/2003) and Gold Wo International Holdings Limited (HCCW No.33/2003).
Orders
- Winding-up order made in each of HCCW Nos.31-33 of 2003
- Costs of the petitioner in each petition to be paid out of the assets of the company concerned
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment