RE CHINA STEEL DEVELOPMENT CO LTD
The court concluded the petitioners proved each company was unable to pay its debts as they fell due and that presentation of petitions and related defaults accelerated indebtedness; accordingly winding-up orders were made for each company and costs were to be paid out of the assets of the company concerned.
- Citation
- RE CHINA STEEL DEVELOPMENT CO LTD
- Parties
- Company (subject): AAHL; Company (subject): AAICL; Company (subject): CSDCL; Company (subject): AAMCL; Company (subject): AA Investments Company Limited; Petitioner: Public Bank (Hong Kong) Limited; Petitioner: Petitioner in HCCW Nos. 140, 141 & 142; Provisional Liquidators: Provisional Liquidators; Official Receiver: Official Receiver; Supporting Creditors: Supporting Creditors: OK Spring Roll Limited Partnership & Asia Aluminum Group Limited; Joint Receivers: Joint Receivers
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 27 July 2009
- Case Number
- HCCW142/2009
- Procedural Posture
- Companies (winding Up) / Winding Up Order Made
- Outcome
- Winding-up orders made in respect of each of the companies named in the petitions.
- Legal Topics
- Winding Up, Inability to Pay Debts, Inter Company Loans, Acceleration of Debt on Default, Creditor Petitions
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
AAHL
Company (subject)
AAICL
Company (subject)
CSDCL
Company (subject)
AAMCL
Company (subject)
AA Investments Company Limited
Company (subject)
Public Bank (Hong Kong) Limited
Petitioner
Petitioner in HCCW Nos. 140, 141 & 142
Petitioner
Provisional Liquidators
Provisional Liquidators
Official Receiver
Official Receiver
Supporting Creditors: OK Spring Roll Limited Partnership & Asia Aluminum Group Limited
Supporting Creditors
Joint Receivers
Joint Receivers
Procedural Posture
Companies (winding Up) / Winding Up Order Made
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether each company was unable to pay its debts as they fell due
- 2 Whether presentation of petitions or events constituted events of default accelerating obligations under senior notes and inter-company loans
- 3 Whether petitioning creditors established entitlement to winding-up orders
Ratio Decidendi
The court concluded the petitioners proved each company was unable to pay its debts as they fell due and that presentation of petitions and related defaults accelerated indebtedness; accordingly winding-up orders were made for each company and costs were to be paid out of the assets of the company concerned.
Court Disposition
Winding-up orders made in respect of each of the companies named in the petitions.
Orders
- Make winding-up order in respect of each of the companies in the four petitions.
- The costs of the petitioner are to be paid out of the assets of the company concerned.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment