RE DESCARTES INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LTD
Given the statutory demand, lack of payment, absence of opposing evidence by the Company, supporting evidence of regulatory contraventions and asset dissipation furnished by the SFC and administrators, the court was satisfied the Company was insolvent under s327 and that it was in the public interest to wind up the Company; continuity justified appointing existing administrators as provisional liquidators and ordering costs to be paid from the Company's assets.
- Citation
- RE DESCARTES INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LTD
- Parties
- Petitioner: Yen Ling Ning; Company (respondent): Descartes Investment Management Limited; Supporting Creditor: Tsang Kuang Ching; Intervener/supporter: Securities and Futures Commission; Joint Administrator and Provisional Liquidator: John Robert Lees; Joint Administrator and Provisional Liquidator: Colum Sebastian Joseph Bancroft; Official Receiver: Official Receiver
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 25 May 2009
- Case Number
- HCCW73/2009
- Procedural Posture
- Winding Up Petition Under Companies Ordinance (cap.32) (companies (winding Up) No.73 of 2009) / Judgment and Orders Made on 25 May 2009 (post Appointment of Administrators on 27 April 2009)
- Outcome
- Winding-up order made; administrators previously appointed to administer the companies continued as provisional liquidators; costs ordered to be paid out of the Company's assets; return/hearing vacated.
- Legal Topics
- Winding Up, Provisional Liquidation, Appointment of Administrators, Statutory Demand, Costs in Insolvency
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Yen Ling Ning
Petitioner
Descartes Investment Management Limited
Company (respondent)
Tsang Kuang Ching
Supporting Creditor
Securities and Futures Commission
Intervener/supporter
John Robert Lees
Joint Administrator and Provisional Liquidator
Colum Sebastian Joseph Bancroft
Joint Administrator and Provisional Liquidator
Official Receiver
Official Receiver
Procedural Posture
Winding Up Petition Under Companies Ordinance (cap.32) (companies (winding Up) No.73 of 2009) / Judgment and Orders Made on 25 May 2009 (post Appointment of Administrators on 27 April 2009)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Company was insolvent and unable to pay its debts within s327 Companies Ordinance
- 2 Whether it was in the public interest to wind up the Company
- 3 Whether administrators should continue as provisional liquidators for continuity and efficiency
Ratio Decidendi
Given the statutory demand, lack of payment, absence of opposing evidence by the Company, supporting evidence of regulatory contraventions and asset dissipation furnished by the SFC and administrators, the court was satisfied the Company was insolvent under s327 and that it was in the public interest to wind up the Company; continuity justified appointing existing administrators as provisional liquidators and ordering costs to be paid from the Company's assets.
Court Disposition
Winding-up order made; administrators previously appointed to administer the companies continued as provisional liquidators; costs ordered to be paid out of the Company's assets; return/hearing vacated.
Orders
- Winding-up order made against Descartes Investment Management Limited dated 25 May 2009
- Order appointing John Robert Lees and Colum Sebastian Joseph Bancroft as provisional liquidators of the Company to continue in office
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment