RE BEST YEAR ENTERPRISES LTD

RE BEST YEAR ENTERPRISES LTD

The petition to wind up the company was not to be adjourned because the company had not paid the full judgment debt into court, had obtained summary judgment against it with no stay pending appeal, and its allegations of fraud were unparticularized and had been insufficient to secure leave to adduce further...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] HKCFI 1636
Parties
Petitioner: Petitioner; Company/respondent: Best Year Enterprises Limited (好年企業有限公司); Official Receiver: Official Receiver; Opposing Creditor: Opposing Creditor
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
24 June 2019
Case Number
HCCW65/2019
Procedural Posture
Companies Winding Up Proceedings / Decision on Winding Up Petition Following Summary Judgment and Applications to File Further Evidence
Outcome
Winding up order made against Best Year Enterprises Limited
Legal Topics
Winding Up, Summary Judgment, Allegation of Fraud in Obtaining Judgment, Stay of Proceedings, Leave to Adduce Further Evidence
Source Language
en
Company Law Insolvency Civil Procedure Winding Up Summary Judgment Allegation of Fraud in Obtaining Judgment Stay of Proceedings Leave to Adduce Further Evidence

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Petitioner

Petitioner

Best Year Enterprises Limited (好年企業有限公司)

Company/respondent

Official Receiver

Official Receiver

Opposing Creditor

Opposing Creditor

Procedural Posture

Companies Winding Up Proceedings / Decision on Winding Up Petition Following Summary Judgment and Applications to File Further Evidence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the petition should be adjourned to enable the company to file further evidence and pay the debt into court
  2. 2 Whether allegations that summary judgment was obtained by fraud and perjurious testimony, without particulars, justify adjourning the petition or staying enforcement
  3. 3 Whether leave to file further evidence should be granted after a prior refusal by Chan J

Ratio Decidendi

The petition to wind up the company was not to be adjourned because the company had not paid the full judgment debt into court, had obtained summary judgment against it with no stay pending appeal, and its allegations of fraud were unparticularized and had been insufficient to secure leave to adduce further evidence; accordingly the court made the usual winding up order.

Court Disposition

Winding up order made against Best Year Enterprises Limited

Orders

  • Make the normal winding up order against Best Year Enterprises Limited
  • No further adjournment of the petition