RE STIRLING DRAINAGE SERVICES LTD
Because the petitioner established a judgment debt, served a demand and the company did not oppose the petition, the court was satisfied the company should be wound up under the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32).
- Citation
- RE STIRLING DRAINAGE SERVICES LTD
- Parties
- Petitioner: Hung Cheuk Kam; Company/respondent: Stirling Drainage Services Limited; Official Receiver: Official Receiver
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 14 July 2003
- Case Number
- HCCW554/2003
- Procedural Posture
- Companies (winding Up) Petition / Hearing and Winding Up Order Made
- Outcome
- Winding-up order made against Stirling Drainage Services Limited
- Legal Topics
- Winding Up, Judgment Debt, Labour Tribunal Award, Statutory Demand, Costs
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hung Cheuk Kam
Petitioner
Stirling Drainage Services Limited
Company/respondent
Official Receiver
Official Receiver
Procedural Posture
Companies (winding Up) Petition / Hearing and Winding Up Order Made
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the company should be wound up for inability to pay its debts
- 2 Whether statutory requirements for presenting a winding-up petition were satisfied (judgment debt and demand)
- 3 Whether petitioner's costs should be paid out of the company's assets
Ratio Decidendi
Because the petitioner established a judgment debt, served a demand and the company did not oppose the petition, the court was satisfied the company should be wound up under the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32).
Court Disposition
Winding-up order made against Stirling Drainage Services Limited
Orders
- Winding-up order made against Stirling Drainage Services Limited
- Petitioner's costs to be paid out of the assets of the Company
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment