WONG SIU YING JOYCE v. KAYWON LTD AND ANOTHER
The audited accounts and company ledgers contemporaneously recorded the sum as an amount due to a director and repayable on demand; the plaintiff served a statutory demand for that sum which remained unpaid; the express trust claim was abandoned and there was insufficient evidence to displace the account entries or infer a restriction on repayment; accordingly the statutory ground for winding up was established and the court properly exercised its discretion to wind up the company; costs were apportioned given partial failure on the just and equitable head (2nd Respondent to pay 75% of petitioner's costs).
- Citation
- WONG SIU YING JOYCE v. KAYWON LTD AND ANOTHER
- Parties
- Petitioner: WONG SIU YING JOYCE; 1st Respondent: KAYWON LIMITED; 2nd Respondent: HO WAI LING MAY
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 16 January 2015
- Case Number
- HCCW104/2013
- Procedural Posture
- Winding Up Petition / Judgment
- Outcome
- Winding up order made against Kaywon Limited
- Legal Topics
- Winding Up, Statutory Demand, Just and Equitable Winding Up, Directors' Loan Accounts, Trust Claim (abandoned)
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
WONG SIU YING JOYCE
Petitioner
KAYWON LIMITED
1st Respondent
HO WAI LING MAY
2nd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Winding Up Petition / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the company was insolvent for winding up purposes based on amounts recorded as due to a director in audited accounts
- 2 Whether the shares or sums were held on trust for nieces and nephews (express trust claim)
- 3 Whether breakdown in relationship/poor book keeping justified winding up on just and equitable grounds
Ratio Decidendi
The audited accounts and company ledgers contemporaneously recorded the sum as an amount due to a director and repayable on demand; the plaintiff served a statutory demand for that sum which remained unpaid; the express trust claim was abandoned and there was insufficient evidence to displace the account entries or infer a restriction on repayment; accordingly the statutory ground for winding up was established and the court properly exercised its discretion to wind up the company; costs were apportioned given partial failure on the just and equitable head (2nd Respondent to pay 75% of petitioner's costs).
Court Disposition
Winding up order made against Kaywon Limited
Orders
- Order that Kaywon Limited be wound up
- Order that the 2nd Respondent (Ho Wai Ling May) pays 75 per cent of the petitioner's costs of the proceedings
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment