DANIEL ISAAC HENRI MIMOUN AND OTHERS v. DRAGON CONCEPT HK LTD AND OTHERS
The petition was dismissed because the petitioners failed to provide the court‑ordered security of HK$700,000 and had not prosecuted the petition for a prolonged period, amounting to abandonment; costs were awarded to the 2nd respondent and the sum of approximately HK$1.52 million paid into court was ordered released to the company.
- Citation
- [2020] HKCFI 2535
- Parties
- 1st Petitioner: Daniel Isaac Henri Mimoun; 2nd Petitioner: Raphaël Vittorio Mimoun; 3rd Petitioner: Excel Future Development Limited; 1st Respondent: Dragon Concept HK Limited; 2nd Respondent: Cameron Investments Limited; 3rd Respondent: Franck David Isaac Berrebi; Beneficiary/petitioner: Axelle Liza Dya Mimoun; Beneficiary/petitioner: Tiffany Fortune Marine Mimoun; Beneficiary/petitioner: Simon Sacha Mimoun
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 25 September 2020
- Case Number
- HCCW434/2012
- Procedural Posture
- Companies (winding Up) Proceedings / Decision on Summons Dated 3 July 2020 (application to Dismiss Petition and for Payment Out of Funds)
- Outcome
- Petition dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Winding Up, Security for Costs, Dismissal for Want of Prosecution, Service Out of Jurisdiction, Payment Out of Funds in Court, Costs
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Daniel Isaac Henri Mimoun
1st Petitioner
Raphaël Vittorio Mimoun
2nd Petitioner
Excel Future Development Limited
3rd Petitioner
Dragon Concept HK Limited
1st Respondent
Cameron Investments Limited
2nd Respondent
Franck David Isaac Berrebi
3rd Respondent
Axelle Liza Dya Mimoun
Beneficiary/petitioner
Tiffany Fortune Marine Mimoun
Beneficiary/petitioner
Simon Sacha Mimoun
Beneficiary/petitioner
Procedural Posture
Companies (winding Up) Proceedings / Decision on Summons Dated 3 July 2020 (application to Dismiss Petition and for Payment Out of Funds)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the petition should be dismissed for failure to provide security for costs as ordered
- 2 Whether the petition should be dismissed for want of prosecution/abandonment
- 3 Whether funds paid into court should be paid out to the company
Ratio Decidendi
The petition was dismissed because the petitioners failed to provide the court‑ordered security of HK$700,000 and had not prosecuted the petition for a prolonged period, amounting to abandonment; costs were awarded to the 2nd respondent and the sum of approximately HK$1.52 million paid into court was ordered released to the company.
Court Disposition
Petition dismissed
Orders
- Petition dismissed
- Costs awarded against the petitioners to the 2nd respondent
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment