RE EVERGREEN INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS LTD

RE EVERGREEN INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS LTD

The court dismissed the petition (to be formally pronounced 6 September 2021) and a substitution application; it did not decide whether observations in Kam Leung bind lower courts or undermine Re Grand Peace, noting that Grand Peace itself shows the Court of Final Appeal’s decision was not a barrier to that decision and identifying discrete issues that would need full argument if the point were pursued.

Citation
[2021] HKCFI 2694
Parties
Company: Evergreen International Holdings Limited; Supporting Creditor: Feng GuangWei; Supporting Creditor: Smart Success International Enterprises Limited; Supporting Creditor: Wang Hui; Supporting Creditor: Lei Bin; Supporting Creditor: Tan Xiao Yun; Opposing Creditor: Max Era Properties Limited; Petitioner: Petitioner; Official Receiver: Official Receiver
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
2 September 2021
Case Number
HCCW312/2020
Procedural Posture
Companies Winding‑up Petition / Hearing and Short Reasons/decision (petition to Be Dismissed)
Outcome
Petition to wind up dismissed; one substitution application withdrawn by consent and the other dismissed; formal dismissal to be pronounced on 6 September 2021.
Legal Topics
Winding Up, In Personam Jurisdiction Over Directors, Binding Effect of Judicial Observations, Substitution Applications
Source Language
EN

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Evergreen International Holdings Limited

Company

Feng GuangWei

Supporting Creditor

Smart Success International Enterprises Limited

Supporting Creditor

Wang Hui

Supporting Creditor

Lei Bin

Supporting Creditor

Tan Xiao Yun

Supporting Creditor

Max Era Properties Limited

Opposing Creditor

Petitioner

Petitioner

Official Receiver

Official Receiver

Procedural Posture

Companies Winding‑up Petition / Hearing and Short Reasons/decision (petition to Be Dismissed)

  1. 1 Whether observations of Ma CJ and Lord Millett NPJ in Kam Leung Sui Kwan v Kam Kwan Lai constitute a binding finding affecting lower courts and the correctness of Re Grand Peace
  2. 2 Whether paragraphs [20] and [32] and paragraph [39] of the Court of Final Appeal decision relate respectively to the first and second core requirements and the justification for treating [39] as relevant to the second core requirement
  3. 3 Whether the fact that Kam Leung concerned a solvent company and disputes between Hong Kong resident ultimate owners affects the applicability of the Court of Final Appeal’s reasoning to cases like Grand Peace involving foreign‑incorporated companies

Ratio Decidendi

The court dismissed the petition (to be formally pronounced 6 September 2021) and a substitution application; it did not decide whether observations in Kam Leung bind lower courts or undermine Re Grand Peace, noting that Grand Peace itself shows the Court of Final Appeal’s decision was not a barrier to that decision and identifying discrete issues that would need full argument if the point were pursued.

Court Disposition

Petition to wind up dismissed; one substitution application withdrawn by consent and the other dismissed; formal dismissal to be pronounced on 6 September 2021.

Orders

  • Petition to wind up Evergreen International Holdings Limited dismissed
  • One substitution application withdrawn by consent