CHOW HOW YEEN MARGARET AND OTHERS v. WEX PHARMACEUTICALS INC AND ANOTHER
The court exercised its discretion to discharge the writ extension order and the order granting leave to serve out, and to set aside service on the defendants because the plaintiffs failed to establish a good reason to extend the writ (GlobalMed being fictitious was not material given the replacement Acro Pharm agreement), the relevant facts were discoverable earlier making the claims at least arguably time-barred under the Limitation Ordinance s26, and there was material non-disclosure in the ex parte application; on that basis the extension, leave and service were properly discharged and set aside.
- Citation
- CHOW HOW YEEN MARGARET AND OTHERS v. WEX PHARMACEUTICALS INC AND ANOTHER
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: CHOW HOW YEEN MARGARET; 2nd Plaintiff: GAO CHENG (XIE LI) COMPANY LTD; 3rd Plaintiff: MUSCULAR INVESTMENT COMPANY LTD; 1st Defendant: WEX PHARMACEUTICALS INC; 2nd Defendant: WEX MEDICAL LTD
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 7 March 2013
- Case Number
- HCA1035/2011
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Action (share Purchase; Alleged Misrepresentation/deceit; Breach of Agreement; Service Out of Jurisdiction) / Interlocutory Applications in Chambers to Discharge Writ Extension, Set Aside Service and Discharge Leave to Serve Out
- Outcome
- Writ extension order discharged; order granting leave to serve out discharged; service of writ on defendants set aside; costs to follow the event and to be summarily assessed.
- Legal Topics
- Writ Extension Under Order 6 R 8, Service Out of Jurisdiction and Leave, Limitation Ordinance S26 (discovery Rule), Non Disclosure in Ex Parte Applications, Amendment of Pleadings, Setting Aside Service
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CHOW HOW YEEN MARGARET
1st Plaintiff
GAO CHENG (XIE LI) COMPANY LTD
2nd Plaintiff
MUSCULAR INVESTMENT COMPANY LTD
3rd Plaintiff
WEX PHARMACEUTICALS INC
1st Defendant
WEX MEDICAL LTD
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Action (share Purchase; Alleged Misrepresentation/deceit; Breach of Agreement; Service Out of Jurisdiction) / Interlocutory Applications in Chambers to Discharge Writ Extension, Set Aside Service and Discharge Leave to Serve Out
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there was good reason to extend validity of the writ under Order 6 r 8
- 2 Whether the original and amended claims were time-barred under the Limitation Ordinance (Cap 347) and s26 discovery rule
- 3 Whether the amended misrepresentation/deceit claim was properly pleaded
Ratio Decidendi
The court exercised its discretion to discharge the writ extension order and the order granting leave to serve out, and to set aside service on the defendants because the plaintiffs failed to establish a good reason to extend the writ (GlobalMed being fictitious was not material given the replacement Acro Pharm agreement), the relevant facts were discoverable earlier making the claims at least arguably time-barred under the Limitation Ordinance s26, and there was material non-disclosure in the ex parte application; on that basis the extension, leave and service were properly discharged and set aside.
Court Disposition
Writ extension order discharged; order granting leave to serve out discharged; service of writ on defendants set aside; costs to follow the event and to be summarily assessed.
Orders
- Discharge the ex parte writ extension order dated 22 June 2012
- Discharge the ex parte order dated 17 October 2012 granting leave to serve WEX Canada out of the jurisdiction
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment