A v. B

A v. B

Defendant succeeded in obtaining a stay in favour of arbitration and established that the arbitration clause operated as written; Plaintiff's arguments that the clause was inoperative were unmeritorious and Plaintiff contested the summons up to the substantive hearing; absent special circumstances the established...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] HKCFI 6367
Parties
Plaintiff: A; Defendant: B
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
23 December 2025
Case Number
HCCT125/2024
Procedural Posture
Construction and Arbitration Proceedings / Costs Determination Following Order to Stay Proceedings in Favour of Arbitration (paper Disposal)
Outcome
Costs awarded to Defendant on an indemnity basis in respect of the summons to stay proceedings in favour of arbitration.
Legal Topics
Stay in Favour of Arbitration, Enforcement of Arbitration Agreement, Indemnity Costs, Costs Taxation, Contractual Dispute Resolution Clauses
Source Language
en
Construction Law Arbitration Law Civil Procedure Costs Law Stay in Favour of Arbitration Enforcement of Arbitration Agreement Indemnity Costs Costs Taxation +1 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

A

Plaintiff

B

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Construction and Arbitration Proceedings / Costs Determination Following Order to Stay Proceedings in Favour of Arbitration (paper Disposal)

  1. 1 Whether the Defendant is entitled to costs on an indemnity basis in respect of the summons to stay proceedings in favour of arbitration
  2. 2 Whether the Plaintiff's challenge to the arbitration clause (GC 18) was reasonable or amounted to an unmeritorious attempt to litigate in breach of the arbitration agreement
  3. 3 Whether the Defendant's conduct in refusing consent to commence arbitration before contractual conditions were satisfied was unreasonable

Ratio Decidendi

Defendant succeeded in obtaining a stay in favour of arbitration and established that the arbitration clause operated as written; Plaintiff's arguments that the clause was inoperative were unmeritorious and Plaintiff contested the summons up to the substantive hearing; absent special circumstances the established practice and authorities require awarding indemnity costs in such cases; accordingly the costs of and occasioned by the summons are to be paid by Plaintiff to Defendant on an indemnity basis, to be taxed if not agreed.

Court Disposition

Costs awarded to Defendant on an indemnity basis in respect of the summons to stay proceedings in favour of arbitration.

Orders

  • The costs of and occasioned by the Summons, including all costs reserved and the costs of the submissions lodged for the purpose of the costs issue, are to be paid by the Plaintiff to the Defendant forthwith on an indemnity basis, to be taxed if not agreed.