LAU KOON YING MATTHEW v. LAU TARK WING AND OTHERS
Defendant's accounts were unreliable and deficient; the trial judge's adverse findings against defendant stand; the court ordered repayment of the Father's sale proceeds of HK$1,084,617, accepted the plaintiff's calculations of rental proceeds over those of the defendant, refused any deduction for construction costs...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] HKCFI 995
- Parties
- Plaintiff and Executor of the Estate of Lau Yiu Wing, Deceased: Lau Koon Ying Matthew; 1st Defendant: Lau Tark Wing; 2nd Defendant (as Executor of the Estate of Tang Mei Ho, Deceased): Lau Tark Wing; Defendant (2nd/3rd Defendant in Actions): CABA Resources Limited; Defendant (2nd/3rd Defendant in Actions): Wing Hing Resources Limited
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 29 April 2019
- Case Number
- HCA2306/2012
- Procedural Posture
- Probate and Related Civil Actions (taking of Account) / Post Trial Taking of Account Hearing (summons for Taking of Account)
- Outcome
- Summons for taking of account determined: defendant to account and repay estate sums; plaintiff's calculations of rental proceeds accepted; no credit for construction costs; compound interest awarded; costs to plaintiff.
- Legal Topics
- Accounting by Trustee, Misappropriation and Restitution, Compound Interest, Rental and Sale Proceeds, Construction Costs Deduction, Costs
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lau Koon Ying Matthew
Plaintiff and Executor of the Estate of Lau Yiu Wing, Deceased
Lau Tark Wing
1st Defendant
Lau Tark Wing
2nd Defendant (as Executor of the Estate of Tang Mei Ho, Deceased)
CABA Resources Limited
Defendant (2nd/3rd Defendant in Actions)
Wing Hing Resources Limited
Defendant (2nd/3rd Defendant in Actions)
Procedural Posture
Probate and Related Civil Actions (taking of Account) / Post Trial Taking of Account Hearing (summons for Taking of Account)
Legal Issues
- 1 What are the applicable legal principles for a taking of account?
- 2 How were the Sale Proceeds dealt with and what is repayable to the Father's estate?
- 3 Quantum of gross rental proceeds received and allowable deductions; what should be repaid to the estate and plaintiff?
Ratio Decidendi
Defendant's accounts were unreliable and deficient; the trial judge's adverse findings against defendant stand; the court ordered repayment of the Father's sale proceeds of HK$1,084,617, accepted the plaintiff's calculations of rental proceeds over those of the defendant, refused any deduction for construction costs for lack of proof and awarded compound interest against the accounting parties; costs follow the event with an order nisi for defendants to pay plaintiff's costs.
Court Disposition
Summons for taking of account determined: defendant to account and repay estate sums; plaintiff's calculations of rental proceeds accepted; no credit for construction costs; compound interest awarded; costs to plaintiff.
Orders
- Defendant (Lau Tark Wing) to account and to repay HK$1,084,617 to the estate of Lau Yiu Wing together with interest to be determined by the court
- Court accepts plaintiff's calculations of rental proceeds; defendants to account for and pay rental sums as calculated by the plaintiff (per the taking of account)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment