MA CHING WANG, a minor by YUNG MEI YUE, lawful and natural mother and next friend v. CHOY YEE LIM AND ANOTHER
The court found unexplained, unjustified and inordinate delays principally caused by the plaintiff's solicitors (with some defendant delay) and refused to vacate a milestone assessment hearing absent exceptional circumstances; the court imposed a costs order for the hearing in the cause (certificate for counsel) and...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] HKDC 890
- Parties
- Plaintiff (minor): MA CHING WANG (minor) by YUNG MEI YUE; 1st Defendant: CHOY YEE LIM; 2nd Defendant: POON KIN WO
- Court
- District Court
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 20 August 2021
- Case Number
- DCPI2229/2017
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injuries Action (district Court) / Case Management and Pre Trial Assessment of Damages (clr Process; Order 80 R11 Approval Pending)
- Outcome
- Application to vacate the assessment hearing refused; found inordinate delays chiefly caused by plaintiff's solicitors; Order 80 r11 approval application adjourned to another judge; costs for the 12 July 2021 hearing ordered in the cause with certificate for counsel; plaintiff's costs to be taxed under Legal Aid...
- Legal Topics
- Adjournment, Delay, Sanctions, Assessment of Damages, Settlement Approval (order 80 R11), Milestone Dates (order 25 R3)
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
MA CHING WANG (minor) by YUNG MEI YUE
Plaintiff (minor)
CHOY YEE LIM
1st Defendant
POON KIN WO
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Personal Injuries Action (district Court) / Case Management and Pre Trial Assessment of Damages (clr Process; Order 80 R11 Approval Pending)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether delays and repeated joint adjournments were justified
- 2 Which party or legal representatives were responsible for delays
- 3 Whether to vacate a milestone assessment hearing and/or approve last-minute settlement procedures
Ratio Decidendi
The court found unexplained, unjustified and inordinate delays principally caused by the plaintiff's solicitors (with some defendant delay) and refused to vacate a milestone assessment hearing absent exceptional circumstances; the court imposed a costs order for the hearing in the cause (certificate for counsel) and directed that stricter case management measures and potential sanctions (including costs disallowance and solicitor personal liability in appropriate cases) will be applied in future PI cases where parties repeatedly seek adjournments without proper written explanations.
Court Disposition
Application to vacate the assessment hearing refused; found inordinate delays chiefly caused by plaintiff's solicitors; Order 80 r11 approval application adjourned to another judge; costs for the 12 July 2021 hearing ordered in the cause with certificate for counsel; plaintiff's costs to be taxed under Legal Aid...
Orders
- Refused the parties' joint application to vacate the assessment of damages hearing (milestone date under Order 25 r3)
- Adjourned the Order 80, rule 11 application for approval of infant settlement to another judge in September 2021
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment