TAN MAN KOU AND ANOTHER v. CHIME CORPORATION LTD AND OTHERS
The court exercised its discretion to grant a short extension to 13 November 2003 but refused to award costs to the 2nd respondent; instead it awarded costs to the petitioners on the basis that the 2nd respondent sought an indulgence, the petitioners were not at fault, and concerns about compliance justified the petitioners' conduct; the petitioners' costs are to be taxed on a trustee basis and paid out of the estate.
- Citation
- TAN MAN KOU AND ANOTHER v. CHIME CORPORATION LTD AND OTHERS
- Parties
- Petitioner (joint Administrator Pendente Lite of the Estate of WANG TEH Huei): TAN MAN KOU; Petitioner (joint Administrator Pendente Lite of the Estate of WANG TEH Huei): CHEUNG YAT MING; 1st Respondent: CHIME CORPORATION LIMITED; 2nd Respondent: NINA KUNG alias NINA T H WANG; 3rd Respondent: KUNG YAN SUM (formerly known as GONG XIAN XIN); 4th Respondent: FORUM EVER LIMITED; 5th Respondent: FOCUS PROFIT LIMITED; 6th Respondent: LIU YUAN CHUN; 7th Respondent: JOSEPH WING KONG LEUNG; 8th Respondent: CHAN KAM POR; 9th Respondent: KWOK KI LI
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 11 November 2003
- Case Number
- HCMP4146/2001
- Procedural Posture
- Companies Ordinance Proceeding (miscellaneous Proceedings) / Interlocutory Application Hearing
- Outcome
- Application granted in part: extension granted; costs awarded to petitioners and to be taxed on trustee basis and paid out of the estate.
- Legal Topics
- Administration of Estate, Extension of Time, Costs Order, Undertaking
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
TAN MAN KOU
Petitioner (joint Administrator Pendente Lite of the Estate of WANG TEH Huei)
CHEUNG YAT MING
Petitioner (joint Administrator Pendente Lite of the Estate of WANG TEH Huei)
CHIME CORPORATION LIMITED
1st Respondent
NINA KUNG alias NINA T H WANG
2nd Respondent
KUNG YAN SUM (formerly known as GONG XIAN XIN)
3rd Respondent
FORUM EVER LIMITED
4th Respondent
FOCUS PROFIT LIMITED
5th Respondent
LIU YUAN CHUN
6th Respondent
JOSEPH WING KONG LEUNG
7th Respondent
CHAN KAM POR
8th Respondent
KWOK KI LI
9th Respondent
Procedural Posture
Companies Ordinance Proceeding (miscellaneous Proceedings) / Interlocutory Application Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether to extend the period for setting up the account pursuant to the prior order
- 2 Whether the 2nd respondent should be awarded the costs of the application
- 3 Whether an undertaking should be required from the 2nd respondent
Ratio Decidendi
The court exercised its discretion to grant a short extension to 13 November 2003 but refused to award costs to the 2nd respondent; instead it awarded costs to the petitioners on the basis that the 2nd respondent sought an indulgence, the petitioners were not at fault, and concerns about compliance justified the petitioners' conduct; the petitioners' costs are to be taxed on a trustee basis and paid out of the estate.
Court Disposition
Application granted in part: extension granted; costs awarded to petitioners and to be taxed on trustee basis and paid out of the estate.
Orders
- The period for setting up the account by the 2nd respondent pursuant to paragraph 1 of the order dated 31 October 2003 is extended to 13 November 2003.
- The costs of this application are awarded to the petitioners in any event.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment