LAM KA WAI REBECCA AND ANOTHER v. LAM JENNY, THE ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF LAM KAM WAI AND OTHERS
The defendants' conduct in opposing appointment of a professional administrator was unsupported by adequate evidence, was obstructive, and constituted hostile litigation within the class identified in Re Estate of Leung Lit; accordingly the unsuccessful defendants must pay costs and the conduct justified an award on...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] HKCFI 530
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: LAM KA WAI REBECCA; 2nd Plaintiff: LAM KAI CHEUNG; 1st Defendant: LAM JENNY, THE ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF LAM KAM WAI; 2nd Defendant: CHUI PAK MING NORMAN, THE ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF LAM KAM WAI; 3rd Defendant: LAM CALINA KA LING; 4th Defendant: LAM KA KEI ANNIE; 5th Defendant: LAM PHILIP KAI TAK
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 22 February 2023
- Case Number
- HCMP1014/2021
- Procedural Posture
- Probate and Administration Proceedings (appointment/removal of Administrators) / Costs Decision Following Substantive Administration Ruling
- Outcome
- Costs awarded to the Plaintiffs on an indemnity basis; Defendants' submissions that costs be paid from the estate rejected
- Legal Topics
- Administration of Estate, Appointment of Professional Administrator, Indemnity Costs, Removal of Administrators, Estate Investigation
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
LAM KA WAI REBECCA
1st Plaintiff
LAM KAI CHEUNG
2nd Plaintiff
LAM JENNY, THE ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF LAM KAM WAI
1st Defendant
CHUI PAK MING NORMAN, THE ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF LAM KAM WAI
2nd Defendant
LAM CALINA KA LING
3rd Defendant
LAM KA KEI ANNIE
4th Defendant
LAM PHILIP KAI TAK
5th Defendant
Procedural Posture
Probate and Administration Proceedings (appointment/removal of Administrators) / Costs Decision Following Substantive Administration Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether costs should be awarded on an indemnity basis
- 2 Whether defendants' conduct justified ordering costs against them personally rather than from the estate
- 3 Whether the opponents' conduct in resisting appointment of a professional administrator was unreasonable and obstructive
Ratio Decidendi
The defendants' conduct in opposing appointment of a professional administrator was unsupported by adequate evidence, was obstructive, and constituted hostile litigation within the class identified in Re Estate of Leung Lit; accordingly the unsuccessful defendants must pay costs and the conduct justified an award on an indemnity basis.
Court Disposition
Costs awarded to the Plaintiffs on an indemnity basis; Defendants' submissions that costs be paid from the estate rejected
Orders
- Costs awarded to the Plaintiffs on an indemnity basis
- Submissions that costs should be borne by the estate are rejected
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment