THE BANK OF NEW YORK v. ADRIENNE MARSH LEFKOWITZ
On the facts the court exercised its discretion under s.36 to permit transfer of US$4.7m to the US administrators: the transfer did not infringe s.42 because the Hong Kong administration remained under officers appointed by and under control of the Hong Kong court and did not enable the plaintiff to act as Hong Kong executor; it did not constitute prohibited distribution under s.40(2) because it was a reasonable transfer to further administration abroad while leaving sufficient funds in Hong Kong to protect the defendant's claims; the application was not premature given the state of administration and no demonstrated prejudice.
- Citation
- THE BANK OF NEW YORK v. ADRIENNE MARSH LEFKOWITZ
- Parties
- Plaintiff (permanent Executor and Trustee; Applicants Via Administrators Pendente Lite): The Bank of New York; Defendant (beneficiary and Former Executrix Removed in Us): Adrienne Marsh Lefkowitz; Deceased: Nicholas V. Marsh (deceased)
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 15 November 1993
- Case Number
- HCAP5/1991
- Procedural Posture
- Probate and Administration (administration Pendente Lite) / Interim Application Under S.36 for Transfer of Assets Pendente Lite (hearing in Chambers)
- Outcome
- Application granted in part; transfer of US$4.7m to United States administrators permitted.
- Legal Topics
- Administration Pendente Lite, Transfer of Assets Across Jurisdictions, Jurisdiction to Permit Transfer, Section 42 Probate and Administration Ordinance, Section 40(2) Probate and Administration Ordinance, Prejudice to Beneficiaries
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Bank of New York
Plaintiff (permanent Executor and Trustee; Applicants Via Administrators Pendente Lite)
Adrienne Marsh Lefkowitz
Defendant (beneficiary and Former Executrix Removed in Us)
Nicholas V. Marsh (deceased)
Deceased
Procedural Posture
Probate and Administration (administration Pendente Lite) / Interim Application Under S.36 for Transfer of Assets Pendente Lite (hearing in Chambers)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether administrators pendente lite may transfer estate funds to foreign (US) administrators
- 2 Whether the proposed transfer infringes s.42 (prohibition on acting as executor where grant exists)
- 3 Whether the transfer amounts to an unlawful distribution contrary to s.40(2)
Ratio Decidendi
On the facts the court exercised its discretion under s.36 to permit transfer of US$4.7m to the US administrators: the transfer did not infringe s.42 because the Hong Kong administration remained under officers appointed by and under control of the Hong Kong court and did not enable the plaintiff to act as Hong Kong executor; it did not constitute prohibited distribution under s.40(2) because it was a reasonable transfer to further administration abroad while leaving sufficient funds in Hong Kong to protect the defendant's claims; the application was not premature given the state of administration and no demonstrated prejudice.
Court Disposition
Application granted in part; transfer of US$4.7m to United States administrators permitted.
Orders
- Administrators pendente lite are permitted to transfer US$4.7m to the United States administrators.
- Sufficient funds to be retained in Hong Kong to prevent prejudice to the defendant's claims and rights.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment