HARVEY SIN WAI LEE v. OFFICIAL ADMINISTRATOR AND ANOTHER
On the balance of probabilities the court found there was no valid customary adoption of C S Lee in Toishan in 1928 and the purported post‑death appointment at the 1947 Oi Kwan Hotel meeting was ineffective for want of the required ancestral‑worship ceremony; the asserted 1960 gift by Madam Chow to Madam Wong failed because there was no parting with dominion and no effective donatio mortis causa; accordingly the estate succeeds and judgment is entered for the estate against Madam Wong and Luk Hoi Tong for recovery of the shares and frozen dividends; the grant to C S Lee is prima facie revocable but disposal on revocation and appointment of a new administrator require further hearing and...
- Citation
- HARVEY SIN WAI LEE v. OFFICIAL ADMINISTRATOR AND ANOTHER
- Parties
- Original Plaintiff / Administrator: Lee Chaio Sing (C S Lee); Defendant / Respondent: Lee Wong Siu Tsing (Madam Wong); Plaintiff (probate): Harvey Sin Wai Lee; Defendant / Company: The Luk Hoi Tong Company Limited; Representative / 2nd Defendant: Official Administrator (representing estate of Lee Sing Hon)
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 16 September 2005
- Case Number
- HCAP4/2000
- Procedural Posture
- Civil — Probate, Succession and Proprietary Claims / First Instance Judgment Following Trial
- Outcome
- Judgment for the estate of the deceased; adoption claim by C S Lee rejected; gift claim by Madam Wong rejected; judgment to be entered against Madam Wong and Luk Hoi Tong; further hearing to determine revocation of grant and appointment of new independent administrator and consequential relief including costs.
- Legal Topics
- Adoption, Gift, Donatio Mortis Causa, Letters of Administration, Revocation of Grant, Incomplete Gift, Constructive Trust, Chinese Customary Law, Transfer of Shares, Appointment of Administrator
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lee Chaio Sing (C S Lee)
Original Plaintiff / Administrator
Lee Wong Siu Tsing (Madam Wong)
Defendant / Respondent
Harvey Sin Wai Lee
Plaintiff (probate)
The Luk Hoi Tong Company Limited
Defendant / Company
Official Administrator (representing estate of Lee Sing Hon)
Representative / 2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil — Probate, Succession and Proprietary Claims / First Instance Judgment Following Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether C S Lee was validly adopted by the deceased (1928 adoption alleged)
- 2 Whether the 1960 transfer/gift by Madam Chow to Madam Wong and Yat Sun was valid (donatio mortis causa or absolute gift)
- 3 Whether the 1985 registration of shares in Madam Wong's name was void for want of capacity or fraud
Ratio Decidendi
On the balance of probabilities the court found there was no valid customary adoption of C S Lee in Toishan in 1928 and the purported post‑death appointment at the 1947 Oi Kwan Hotel meeting was ineffective for want of the required ancestral‑worship ceremony; the asserted 1960 gift by Madam Chow to Madam Wong failed because there was no parting with dominion and no effective donatio mortis causa; accordingly the estate succeeds and judgment is entered for the estate against Madam Wong and Luk Hoi Tong for recovery of the shares and frozen dividends; the grant to C S Lee is prima facie revocable but disposal on revocation and appointment of a new administrator require further hearing and...
Court Disposition
Judgment for the estate of the deceased; adoption claim by C S Lee rejected; gift claim by Madam Wong rejected; judgment to be entered against Madam Wong and Luk Hoi Tong; further hearing to determine revocation of grant and appointment of new independent administrator and consequential relief including costs.
Orders
- Judgment entered for the estate of Lee Sing Hon against Madam Wong Siu Tsing and The Luk Hoi Tong Company Limited
- Luk Hoi Tong to pay frozen dividends to the estate (precise terms to be settled and submitted for court approval)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment