ADRIAN MICHAEL CAPPON v. DOV LAROM

ADRIAN MICHAEL CAPPON v. DOV LAROM

The court accepted the Defendant's account that the US$60,000 was a financial adjustment/settlement related to the joint venture and not a loan; the Defendant discharged the onus and the Plaintiff's claim was dismissed.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
ADRIAN MICHAEL CAPPON v. DOV LAROM
Parties
Plaintiff: Adrian Michael Cappon; Defendant: Dov Larom
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
10 July 1997
Case Number
HCA1052/1995
Procedural Posture
Civil Loan/contract Dispute / Judgment (court of First Instance)
Outcome
Plaintiff's claim dismissed.
Legal Topics
Loan Characterization, Settlement Agreement, Joint Venture Accounting, Onus of Proof
Source Language
en
Commercial Law Contract Law Company Law Equity Loan Characterization Settlement Agreement Joint Venture Accounting Onus of Proof

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Adrian Michael Cappon

Plaintiff

Dov Larom

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Loan/contract Dispute / Judgment (court of First Instance)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether US$60,000 was a loan or a capital adjustment/payment
  2. 2 Whether the Defendant discharged the onus to show the payment was not a loan
  3. 3 Whether the August 4, 1994 agreement settled accounts between the parties

Ratio Decidendi

The court accepted the Defendant's account that the US$60,000 was a financial adjustment/settlement related to the joint venture and not a loan; the Defendant discharged the onus and the Plaintiff's claim was dismissed.

Court Disposition

Plaintiff's claim dismissed.

Orders

  • Plaintiff's claim dismissed.