YIP KWOK SUN v. POLY-STYLE LTD
On the balance of probabilities the Yip family acquired factual and exclusive possession of the disputed portion for the requisite continuous period (at least 12 years prior to commencement) and the deceased developed the requisite intention to possess; the Tong defence failed for lack of evidence of living members; accordingly defendant's title to that portion was extinguished under s.17 Limitation Ordinance and the plaintiff acquired a possessory title; defendant's trespass counterclaim dismissed.
- Citation
- [2018] HKDC 437
- Parties
- Plaintiff (administratrix / Wife): Mdm Seekao Luan; Original Plaintiff (deceased): Mr Yip Kwok Sun (deceased); Defendant (registered Owner): Defendant company (registered owner of remaining portion of Lot 1275 in DD 79)
- Court
- District Court
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 26 April 2018
- Case Number
- DCMP2891/2011
- Procedural Posture
- Adverse Possession and Trespass (limitation Ordinance) / Judgment (trial Concluded)
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's claim allowed: declarations granted that plaintiff had been in adverse possession of a portion of Remaining Portion of Lot No.1275 in D.D.79 (pink in Plan 2) for a continuous period of no less than 12 years prior to commencement; defendant's title extinguished under s.17 Limitation Ordinance; plaintiff...
- Legal Topics
- Adverse Possession, Limitation Ordinance S.17 and S.38 a, Intention to Possess, Factual Possession, Continuity/abandonment, Burden of Proof Re: Tong Owners, Weight of Hearsay/statutory Declaration
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mdm Seekao Luan
Plaintiff (administratrix / Wife)
Mr Yip Kwok Sun (deceased)
Original Plaintiff (deceased)
Defendant company (registered owner of remaining portion of Lot 1275 in DD 79)
Defendant (registered Owner)
Procedural Posture
Adverse Possession and Trespass (limitation Ordinance) / Judgment (trial Concluded)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff (Yip family) had factual possession of the disputed land for the requisite period
- 2 Whether the deceased had the requisite intention to possess to the exclusion of the world
- 3 Whether possession was continuous or discontinued during 1999-2001
Ratio Decidendi
On the balance of probabilities the Yip family acquired factual and exclusive possession of the disputed portion for the requisite continuous period (at least 12 years prior to commencement) and the deceased developed the requisite intention to possess; the Tong defence failed for lack of evidence of living members; accordingly defendant's title to that portion was extinguished under s.17 Limitation Ordinance and the plaintiff acquired a possessory title; defendant's trespass counterclaim dismissed.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's claim allowed: declarations granted that plaintiff had been in adverse possession of a portion of Remaining Portion of Lot No.1275 in D.D.79 (pink in Plan 2) for a continuous period of no less than 12 years prior to commencement; defendant's title extinguished under s.17 Limitation Ordinance; plaintiff...
Orders
- Declarations recorded in favour of the plaintiff as stated in the judgment
- Order nisi that the defendant pay the plaintiff's costs of the claim and of the counterclaim, including trial costs with certificate of counsel and all reserved costs, to be taxed if not agreed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment