LU XIAOHUA, the administratrix of the estate of WONG YIU CHUNG, deceased v. HAU SHUN CHI NELSON
On the balance of probabilities the court found the Wong family had continuous exclusive factual possession and the requisite intention to possess Lot 214A from 1975 to 2016; the defendant failed to prove any licence/consent that would negate adverse possession; the presumption of encroachment (if applicable) was rebutted by the specific history and arrangements; accordingly the defendant's registered title was extinguished under section 17 of the Limitation Ordinance and the estate of Wong acquired a possessory title; the counterclaim was dismissed and the applicant's request for a statutory assignment was refused.
- Citation
- [2020] HKDC 153
- Parties
- Plaintiff (administratrix of the Estate of WONG YIU Chung); Defendant (by Counterclaim): LU XIAOHUA; Defendant (original Action); Plaintiff (by Counterclaim): HAU SHUN CHI NELSON
- Court
- District Court
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 27 March 2020
- Case Number
- DCCJ287/2016
- Procedural Posture
- Adverse Possession / Trial Judgment
- Outcome
- Declaration granted that defendant's registered title extinguished under section 17 Limitation Ordinance and estate of Wong acquired possessory title; counterclaim dismissed; order for assignment refused; costs ordered nisi in favour of Lu
- Legal Topics
- Adverse Possession, Factual Possession, Intention to Possess, Presumption of Encroachment, Evidentiary Weight of Aerial/photographic Evidence
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
LU XIAOHUA
Plaintiff (administratrix of the Estate of WONG YIU Chung); Defendant (by Counterclaim)
HAU SHUN CHI NELSON
Defendant (original Action); Plaintiff (by Counterclaim)
Procedural Posture
Adverse Possession / Trial Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Wong family had factual possession of Lot 214A from 1975 to 2016
- 2 Whether the Wong family had the requisite intention to possess Lot 214A
- 3 Whether the alleged licence/consent from the Hau family negated adverse possession
Ratio Decidendi
On the balance of probabilities the court found the Wong family had continuous exclusive factual possession and the requisite intention to possess Lot 214A from 1975 to 2016; the defendant failed to prove any licence/consent that would negate adverse possession; the presumption of encroachment (if applicable) was rebutted by the specific history and arrangements; accordingly the defendant's registered title was extinguished under section 17 of the Limitation Ordinance and the estate of Wong acquired a possessory title; the counterclaim was dismissed and the applicant's request for a statutory assignment was refused.
Court Disposition
Declaration granted that defendant's registered title extinguished under section 17 Limitation Ordinance and estate of Wong acquired possessory title; counterclaim dismissed; order for assignment refused; costs ordered nisi in favour of Lu
Orders
- Declaration that the defendant's title in respect of Lot 214A has been extinguished pursuant to section 17 of the Limitation Ordinance
- Declaration that the estate of Wong has acquired a possessory title to Lot 214A
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment