CHU SYMON HIN WING as the surviving manager of CHU NAM YUN (OR YUEN) suing on behalf of all members of CHU NAM YUN (OR YUEN) v. LAU KWAI YING, the personal representative of the estate of WONG KAM FAI, deceased AND OTHERS
Defendants failed to demonstrate a real or bona fide defence: as the Premises are held by a registered t'ong and new beneficiary members exist (youngest born 2008), limitation has not run against all beneficiaries and adverse possession cannot extinguish the t'ong's title; payments of rates do not confer beneficial title; procedural objections lacked evidence and were without merit; therefore summary judgment for plaintiff and strike out of counterclaim appropriate.
- Citation
- [2025] HKDC 842
- Parties
- Plaintiff (surviving Manager of Chu Nam Yun Tong): CHU SYMON HIN WING; 1st Defendant (personal Representative of the Estate of Wong Kam Fai): LAU Kwai Ying; 2nd Defendant: OCCUPIER(S) OF THE PREMISES; 3rd Defendant: WONG YAM FOON; 4th Defendant: CHEUNG TUNG WO
- Court
- District Court
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 23 May 2025
- Case Number
- DCMP3069/2019
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Proceedings Under Order 113 (recovery of Land) / Summary Judgment Application and Decision; Striking Out of Counterclaim
- Outcome
- Summary judgment granted for plaintiff; counterclaim of 3rd and 4th defendants struck out; Costs Order Nisi in favour of plaintiff
- Legal Topics
- Adverse Possession, Recovery of Land by T'ong, Chinese Customary T'ong as Trust, Summary Judgment, Striking Out, Limitation Period Computation
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CHU SYMON HIN WING
Plaintiff (surviving Manager of Chu Nam Yun Tong)
LAU Kwai Ying
1st Defendant (personal Representative of the Estate of Wong Kam Fai)
OCCUPIER(S) OF THE PREMISES
2nd Defendant
WONG YAM FOON
3rd Defendant
CHEUNG TUNG WO
4th Defendant
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Proceedings Under Order 113 (recovery of Land) / Summary Judgment Application and Decision; Striking Out of Counterclaim
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether defendants have a real or bona fide defence of adverse possession against a t'ong holding
- 2 Whether the defendants' counterclaim discloses reasonable cause of action
- 3 Whether procedural defects (managers' consent; statements of truth) defeat plaintiff's application
Ratio Decidendi
Defendants failed to demonstrate a real or bona fide defence: as the Premises are held by a registered t'ong and new beneficiary members exist (youngest born 2008), limitation has not run against all beneficiaries and adverse possession cannot extinguish the t'ong's title; payments of rates do not confer beneficial title; procedural objections lacked evidence and were without merit; therefore summary judgment for plaintiff and strike out of counterclaim appropriate.
Court Disposition
Summary judgment granted for plaintiff; counterclaim of 3rd and 4th defendants struck out; Costs Order Nisi in favour of plaintiff
Orders
- 3rd and 4th Defendants to deliver vacant possession of Lot No.1071 Tai Po (the Premises) to Plaintiff
- 3rd and 4th Defendants restrained from trespassing or entering the Premises without Plaintiff's prior consent
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment