RE AHMED SAMIR AND OTHERS

RE AHMED SAMIR AND OTHERS

The court applied established judicial review principles (illegality, irrationality, procedural fairness) and concluded that the applicants failed to establish that the impugned decision was illegal, irrational or procedurally unfair, and therefore refused relief.

Citation
[2019] HKCFI 1067
Parties
Applicant: AHMED SAMIR 1st; Applicant: KHATOON RABIA 2nd; Applicant: AHMED WADUD 3rd; Applicant: AHMED AFAQ 4th
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
7 May 2019
Case Number
HCAL919/2017
Procedural Posture
Constitutional and Administrative Law (judicial Review) High Court, Court of First Instance / Decision (chambers)
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Procedural Fairness, Judicial Review Remedies, Illegality and Irrationality
Source Language
EN

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

AHMED SAMIR 1st

Applicant

KHATOON RABIA 2nd

Applicant

AHMED WADUD 3rd

Applicant

AHMED AFAQ 4th

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Constitutional and Administrative Law (judicial Review) High Court, Court of First Instance / Decision (chambers)

  1. 1 Whether the impugned administrative decision breached procedural fairness
  2. 2 Whether the impugned decision was unlawful or irrational
  3. 3 Whether judicial relief should be granted to the applicants

Ratio Decidendi

The court applied established judicial review principles (illegality, irrationality, procedural fairness) and concluded that the applicants failed to establish that the impugned decision was illegal, irrational or procedurally unfair, and therefore refused relief.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • Application dismissed and no relief granted.