WONG YIN v. UNION BANK OF HONG KONG LTD.
The legal charge's all-moneys clause, read with its covenants, covered Mr Wong's liability as guarantor; Jing Guang defaulted and the guarantor liability therefore existed; accordingly the Bank was entitled to demand repayment for redemption and the defendant's claim that the Bank clogged the equity of redemption was misconceived and failed.
- Citation
- WONG YIN v. UNION BANK OF HONG KONG LTD.
- Parties
- Plaintiff and Counterclaimant: Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (Asia) Ltd (formerly Union Bank of Hong Kong Limited); Defendant and Plaintiff by Counterclaim: Wong Yin
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 18 October 2000
- Case Number
- HCA7578/1999
- Procedural Posture
- Mortgage Action / Counterclaim for Sums and Possession / Judgment (court of First Instance)
- Outcome
- Judgment for the plaintiff and defendant by counterclaim (Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (Asia) Ltd).
- Legal Topics
- All Moneys Clause, Clog on Equity of Redemption, Guarantee Liability, Redemption, Remedies on Repayment
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (Asia) Ltd (formerly Union Bank of Hong Kong Limited)
Plaintiff and Counterclaimant
Wong Yin
Defendant and Plaintiff by Counterclaim
Procedural Posture
Mortgage Action / Counterclaim for Sums and Possession / Judgment (court of First Instance)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the legal charge's all-moneys clause secured guarantor liabilities
- 2 Whether Jing Guang breached the loan agreement and triggered guarantor liability
- 3 Whether the Bank's conduct amounted to a clog or fetter on the equity of redemption
Ratio Decidendi
The legal charge's all-moneys clause, read with its covenants, covered Mr Wong's liability as guarantor; Jing Guang defaulted and the guarantor liability therefore existed; accordingly the Bank was entitled to demand repayment for redemption and the defendant's claim that the Bank clogged the equity of redemption was misconceived and failed.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the plaintiff and defendant by counterclaim (Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (Asia) Ltd).
Orders
- Payment of $10,364,062.76 with further daily interest of HK$2,933.99 at a rate of 2.75% over HK$ Prime (12.15% currently) accruing from 12 October 2000 until payment.
- Payment of $6,998,987.78 with further daily interest of HK$3,986.11 at a rate of 11.25% over HK$ Prime or one-month HIBOR accruing from 12 October 2000 until payment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment