CHINA NATIONAL ARTS AND CRAFTS IMPORT & EXPORT CORPORATION ZHEJIANG BRANCH AND ANOTHER v. SEALAND SERVICE INC. AND OTHERS
The application to withdraw the admission was refused because, on the balance of interests, the Defendant's late change of case was insufficiently explained and would severely prejudice the Plaintiffs in a way not compensable by costs owing to the passage of time and loss of documentary and witness evidence; accordingly the court declined to permit the proposed amendments withdrawing the admission as to the contract of carriage evidenced by Bill of Lading CT319.
- Citation
- CHINA NATIONAL ARTS AND CRAFTS IMPORT & EXPORT CORPORATION ZHEJIANG BRANCH AND ANOTHER v. SEALAND SERVICE INC. AND OTHERS
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: China National Arts and Crafts Import & Export Corporation Zhejiang Branch; 2nd Plaintiff: Jacob Ash Co. Inc.; 1st Defendant: Sealand Service Inc.; 2nd Defendant: Hoi Kong Container Services Co. Ltd.; 3rd Defendant: Freight-Trans International Co. Ltd.; 1st Third Party: Freight-Trans International Co. Ltd.; 2nd Third Party: Hoi Kong Container Services Co. Ltd.
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 20 October 1999
- Case Number
- HCCL90/1990
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial List Contract of Carriage (bill of Lading) / Interlocutory Application for Leave to Amend Points of Defence (withdrawal of Admission)
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Amendment of Pleadings, Withdrawal of Admission, Prejudice From Delay, Authority to Issue Bill of Lading, Summary Judgment Procedure
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
China National Arts and Crafts Import & Export Corporation Zhejiang Branch
1st Plaintiff
Jacob Ash Co. Inc.
2nd Plaintiff
Sealand Service Inc.
1st Defendant
Hoi Kong Container Services Co. Ltd.
2nd Defendant
Freight-Trans International Co. Ltd.
3rd Defendant
Freight-Trans International Co. Ltd.
1st Third Party
Hoi Kong Container Services Co. Ltd.
2nd Third Party
Procedural Posture
Commercial List Contract of Carriage (bill of Lading) / Interlocutory Application for Leave to Amend Points of Defence (withdrawal of Admission)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 1st Defendant should be permitted to withdraw an admission in its Defence
- 2 Whether the Plaintiffs would suffer prejudice not compensable in costs if the amendment were allowed
- 3 Whether the Defendant's explanation for the late change of stance is credible and amounts to good reason to resile from the admission
Ratio Decidendi
The application to withdraw the admission was refused because, on the balance of interests, the Defendant's late change of case was insufficiently explained and would severely prejudice the Plaintiffs in a way not compensable by costs owing to the passage of time and loss of documentary and witness evidence; accordingly the court declined to permit the proposed amendments withdrawing the admission as to the contract of carriage evidenced by Bill of Lading CT319.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- The 1st Defendant's summons dated 21 June 1999 for leave to amend the Points of Defence is dismissed
- Costs of and occasioned by the application to the Plaintiffs, to be taxed if not agreed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment