ANDREW WILLIAM MAXWELL v. KELISTON MARINE (FAR EAST) LTD (now in liquidation) AND ANOTHER
Court found on balance of probabilities that the plaintiff developed asthma around the time of his tunnel work; the plaintiff was exposed to TDI vapour in the tunnels and that exposure materially contributed to the onset of asthma as a cumulative cause; defendants were negligent and breached Regulations 12(3) and 12(4)(a) by failing to provide adequate respiratory protective equipment (filtering mask with charcoal cartridge and particulate filter APF≥20); damages were awarded to plaintiff for PSLA, loss of earning capacity, past medical expenses and future medical expenses with specified interest; contributory negligence not allowed because not pleaded.
- Citation
- ANDREW WILLIAM MAXWELL v. KELISTON MARINE (FAR EAST) LTD (now in liquidation) AND ANOTHER
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Andrew William Maxwell; 1st Defendant: Keliston Marine (Far East) Limited (now in liquidation); 2nd Defendant: Paul Y-Seli Joint Venture (a firm)
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 20 January 2012
- Case Number
- HCPI945/2003
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injuries Action / Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Judgment for the plaintiff; defendants liable in negligence and for breach of Occupational Safety and Health Regulations 12(3) and 12(4)(a)
- Legal Topics
- Isocyanate (tdi) Exposure, Employer Duty of Care, Occupational Safety and Health Regulations (regulation 12), Personal Protective Equipment, Causation (cumulative Causes), Quantification of Non Pecuniary and Future Loss, Expert Evidence on Exposure and Reaction Times
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Andrew William Maxwell
Plaintiff
Keliston Marine (Far East) Limited (now in liquidation)
1st Defendant
Paul Y-Seli Joint Venture (a firm)
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Personal Injuries Action / Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Did the plaintiff suffer from asthma and when did it begin?
- 2 Was the plaintiff exposed to TDI vapour at work?
- 3 Did such exposure cause or materially contribute to the plaintiff developing asthma?
Ratio Decidendi
Court found on balance of probabilities that the plaintiff developed asthma around the time of his tunnel work; the plaintiff was exposed to TDI vapour in the tunnels and that exposure materially contributed to the onset of asthma as a cumulative cause; defendants were negligent and breached Regulations 12(3) and 12(4)(a) by failing to provide adequate respiratory protective equipment (filtering mask with charcoal cartridge and particulate filter APF≥20); damages were awarded to plaintiff for PSLA, loss of earning capacity, past medical expenses and future medical expenses with specified interest; contributory negligence not allowed because not pleaded.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the plaintiff; defendants liable in negligence and for breach of Occupational Safety and Health Regulations 12(3) and 12(4)(a)
Orders
- Award PSLA HK$250000
- Award for loss of earning capacity HK$150000
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment