ANGELA CHEN also known as ANGELA C. SABELLA v. VIVIEN CHEN AND ANOTHER
The court exercised its discretion to uphold the ex parte order and grant assistance under the Letter of Request because the omitted facts were not material to whether Vivien should be ordered to testify on matters spanning from 1995 to present; the relevance of Vivien's evidence is primarily for the California...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- ANGELA CHEN also known as ANGELA C. SABELLA v. VIVIEN CHEN AND ANOTHER
- Parties
- Applicant: Angela Chen also known as Angela C. Sabella; 1st Respondent: Vivien Chen; 2nd Respondent: Sai Wo Enterprises Limited
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 7 December 2011
- Case Number
- HCMP1478/2011
- Procedural Posture
- International Judicial Assistance Under Part VIII of the Evidence Ordinance (letters of Request) / Application to Set Aside Ex Parte Order Granting Assistance to Foreign Court; Pre Trial Interim Proceedings
- Outcome
- Application to set aside the Order dismissed; the Order of Master Hui dated 5 September 2011 upheld insofar as it concerns the 1st Respondent
- Legal Topics
- Letters Rogatory, Part VIII Evidence Ordinance, Order 70 RHC, Duty of Full and Frank Disclosure in Ex Parte Applications, Third Party Discovery, Abuse of Process
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Angela Chen also known as Angela C. Sabella
Applicant
Vivien Chen
1st Respondent
Sai Wo Enterprises Limited
2nd Respondent
Procedural Posture
International Judicial Assistance Under Part VIII of the Evidence Ordinance (letters of Request) / Application to Set Aside Ex Parte Order Granting Assistance to Foreign Court; Pre Trial Interim Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Hong Kong court should give effect to a California letter of request to compel testimony and documents in Hong Kong
- 2 Whether the applicant's non-disclosure of the father's mental incapacity and appointment of a committee (and medical reports) vitiated the ex parte order
- 3 Whether the evidence sought was irrelevant or an abuse of process
Ratio Decidendi
The court exercised its discretion to uphold the ex parte order and grant assistance under the Letter of Request because the omitted facts were not material to whether Vivien should be ordered to testify on matters spanning from 1995 to present; the relevance of Vivien's evidence is primarily for the California court; any non-disclosure was not deliberate nor seriously prejudicial and setting aside the order would risk miscarriage of justice by depriving the foreign court of potentially important evidence.
Court Disposition
Application to set aside the Order dismissed; the Order of Master Hui dated 5 September 2011 upheld insofar as it concerns the 1st Respondent
Orders
- Application to set aside dismissed
- Order of Master Hui dated 5 September 2011 upheld insofar as it concerns the 1st Respondent
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment