CINMEDIA INC. v. CINMEDIA LTD

CINMEDIA INC. v. CINMEDIA LTD

Relief granted because the defaults were inadvertent rather than wilful, no prejudice to shareholders or creditors was shown, directors had been aware of the companies' financial positions, remedial measures were implemented and the directors gave binding assurances to comply with statutory requirements, thereby...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
CINMEDIA INC. v. CINMEDIA LTD
Parties
Plaintiff / Applicant: Cinmedia Inc.; Company Subject to Relief: Cinmedia Limited; Company Subject to Relief: EAR Media Limited; Company Subject to Relief: SAR Media Limited
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
21 August 2009
Case Number
HCMP1398/2009
Procedural Posture
Applications Under Companies Ordinance S111(2) and S122(1 B) to Rectify Statutory Defaults / Decision in Chambers (21 August 2009)
Outcome
Relief granted under Companies Ordinance; order in terms of draft orders save for amendment of a date in HCMP No.1398 of 2009
Legal Topics
Annual General Meetings, Presentation of Accounts, Rectification of Defaults, Discretionary Relief Under Companies Ordinance
Source Language
en
Company Law Corporate Compliance Corporate Governance Annual General Meetings Presentation of Accounts Rectification of Defaults Discretionary Relief Under Companies Ordinance

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Cinmedia Inc.

Plaintiff / Applicant

Cinmedia Limited

Company Subject to Relief

EAR Media Limited

Company Subject to Relief

SAR Media Limited

Company Subject to Relief

Procedural Posture

Applications Under Companies Ordinance S111(2) and S122(1 B) to Rectify Statutory Defaults / Decision in Chambers (21 August 2009)

  1. 1 Whether failures to hold annual general meetings and to lay accounts at AGMs constituted excusable defaults
  2. 2 Whether relief under s111(2) and s122(1B) should be granted despite non‑compliance
  3. 3 Whether defaults were wilful or caused prejudice to shareholders or creditors

Ratio Decidendi

Relief granted because the defaults were inadvertent rather than wilful, no prejudice to shareholders or creditors was shown, directors had been aware of the companies' financial positions, remedial measures were implemented and the directors gave binding assurances to comply with statutory requirements, thereby justifying exercise of the court's discretion under the Companies Ordinance.

Court Disposition

Relief granted under Companies Ordinance; order in terms of draft orders save for amendment of a date in HCMP No.1398 of 2009

Orders

  • Relief granted to rectify defaults under s111(2) and s122(1B) of the Companies Ordinance in HCMP Nos. 1398, 1399 and 1400 of 2009
  • Order to be in terms of the draft orders filed, subject to amendment of a date in the draft order in HCMP No.1398 of 2009