ANTHONY ERIC RYAN HOTUNG v. HOTUNG, MICHAEL ERIC A.B. AND OTHERS
The trustee breached the duty to inform the plaintiff of his beneficial interests on reaching majority but the plaintiff failed to prove any loss or causation arising from that breach and failed to adduce sufficient admissible evidence to substantiate the alleged dubious payments or an undervalue sale; accordingly only nominal damages (HK$1) were awarded, and new evidence and proposed pleadings amendments were refused as prejudicial and hopeless.
- Citation
- [2021] HKCFI 601
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Anthony Eric Ryan Hotung; 1st Defendant: HOTUNG, MICHAEL ERIC A.B.; 1st Defendant (executor): MAK SHUN MING (Executor of the Estate of Ho Yuen Ki Winnie, also known as Ho Yuen Ki); 2nd Defendant: Eric Edward Hotung; 3rd Defendant: Hotung Estates Limited
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 9 March 2021
- Case Number
- HCA1216/2006
- Procedural Posture
- Breach of Trust; Trust Accounting; Removal of Trustee; Equitable Compensation / Trial Judgment (court of First Instance, Judgment Delivered)
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed on substantive pleaded causes except that plaintiff awarded nominal damages of HK$1 for failure to inform; applications for new evidence and amendments refused; costs ordered to 1st Defendant nisi.
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Trust, Failure to Inform Beneficiary on Majority, Sale at Undervalue, Disclosure and Accountability of Trustees, Admission of New Evidence, Amendment of Pleadings, Nominal Damages, Costs
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Anthony Eric Ryan Hotung
Plaintiff
HOTUNG, MICHAEL ERIC A.B.
1st Defendant
MAK SHUN MING (Executor of the Estate of Ho Yuen Ki Winnie, also known as Ho Yuen Ki)
1st Defendant (executor)
Eric Edward Hotung
2nd Defendant
Hotung Estates Limited
3rd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Breach of Trust; Trust Accounting; Removal of Trustee; Equitable Compensation / Trial Judgment (court of First Instance, Judgment Delivered)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trustee breached duties by failing to inform beneficiary on attaining majority
- 2 Whether the trustee must account for alleged dubious payments and advances in HICL and whether claimant proved impropriety
- 3 Whether the sale of land by HICL to Hotung Estates in 1998 was at undervalue and claimant proved loss and quantum
Ratio Decidendi
The trustee breached the duty to inform the plaintiff of his beneficial interests on reaching majority but the plaintiff failed to prove any loss or causation arising from that breach and failed to adduce sufficient admissible evidence to substantiate the alleged dubious payments or an undervalue sale; accordingly only nominal damages (HK$1) were awarded, and new evidence and proposed pleadings amendments were refused as prejudicial and hopeless.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed on substantive pleaded causes except that plaintiff awarded nominal damages of HK$1 for failure to inform; applications for new evidence and amendments refused; costs ordered to 1st Defendant nisi.
Orders
- Award nominal damages to Plaintiff in the sum of HK$1
- Refuse other relief including declaratory relief and account and equitable compensation claimed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment