CHAN CHUN CHEONG v. OCCUPATIONAL DEAFNESS COMPENSATION BOARD
The statutory definition requires each ear to have sensorineural hearing loss of at least 40 decibels; the reliable objective CERA test showed the appellant's left ear at 31.7 dB (below 40 dB); therefore the appellant did not meet the statutory threshold and the appeal is dismissed.
- Citation
- CHAN CHUN CHEONG v. OCCUPATIONAL DEAFNESS COMPENSATION BOARD
- Parties
- Appellant: Appellant; Respondent: Occupational Deafness (Compensation) Board
- Court
- District Court
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 9 October 2006
- Case Number
- DCOA1/2005
- Procedural Posture
- Occupational Deafness Compensation Appeal / Final Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Statutory Interpretation, Medical Expert Evidence, Audiometric Testing, Eligibility Criteria for Compensation, Costs
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Appellant
Appellant
Occupational Deafness (Compensation) Board
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Occupational Deafness Compensation Appeal / Final Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the statutory definition of 'Noise induced deafness' requires at least 40 decibels of sensorineural hearing loss in each ear separately or an average across both ears
- 2 Whether the audiometric evidence (PTA and CERA) was reliable and which test should determine entitlement
- 3 Whether mixed hearing loss affects the assessment of sensorineural hearing loss for statutory qualification
Ratio Decidendi
The statutory definition requires each ear to have sensorineural hearing loss of at least 40 decibels; the reliable objective CERA test showed the appellant's left ear at 31.7 dB (below 40 dB); therefore the appellant did not meet the statutory threshold and the appeal is dismissed.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- Appellant to pay the respondent's costs of the appeal, to be taxed if not agreed, with certificate for counsel
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment