HKSAR v. LAU NGAM CHUNG
The Court upheld the Magistrate's sentencing exercise: starting points and plea reductions were appropriate, the totality principle was properly applied in making part of the immigration sentence consecutive, and the appellant's surrender claim did not alter the factual admission of possession; accordingly the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- HKSAR v. LAU NGAM CHUNG
- Parties
- Appellant: Appellant; Respondent: Respondent
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 27 August 2004
- Case Number
- HCMA692/2004
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal — Appeal Against Sentence / Judgment (court of First Instance)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Possession of Prohibited Weapon, Unlawful Remaining in Hong Kong, Totality Principle in Sentencing, Plea Based Reduction
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Appellant
Appellant
Respondent
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal — Appeal Against Sentence / Judgment (court of First Instance)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed for possession of a flick knife and unlawful remaining was excessive
- 2 Whether the Magistrate erred in rejecting the appellant's claim that he surrendered to police
- 3 Application of plea reduction and totality in aggregating sentences
Ratio Decidendi
The Court upheld the Magistrate's sentencing exercise: starting points and plea reductions were appropriate, the totality principle was properly applied in making part of the immigration sentence consecutive, and the appellant's surrender claim did not alter the factual admission of possession; accordingly the appeal against sentence was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- Overall sentence of 18 months imprisonment to stand
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
bjbj \~g) ____________ Coram: Deputy High Court Judge Wright in Court Date of Hearing: 27 August 2004 Date of Judgment: 27 August 2004 _______________ J U D G M E N T _______________ 1. This is an appeal against sentence. 2. The Appellant pleaded guilty to a charge of possession of a prohibited weapon and a charge of unlawfully remaining in Hong Kong. He was represented. He agreed the prosecution summary of facts which stated that he had been intercepted by a patrolling police officer who had then conducted a search of his person, during the course of which a spring operated folding knife was located. The knife is what is known colloquially as a flick knife: it was some 15cm in length with a blade of some 7cm. 3. The Magistrate took 12 months as the starting point for the weapons offence and reduced it by one third for the plea. A starting point of at least that order was appropriate. The tariff sentence of 15 months after a plea was rightly taken for the immigration offence. The Magistrate considered the issue of totality and ordered that 10 months of the immigration offence be served consecutively to the weapons offence resulting in an overall sentence of 18 months imprisonment. That was a generous approach. 4. A review of the sentence by the Appellant was dismissed. During those proceedings and again in these the Appellant claims that he had surrendered himself to the police. The Magistrate rejected this attempt to modify his earlier unequivocal admissions, as do I. 5. In any event, that would affect neither the issue of possession of the knife which the Appellant still accepts he had in his pocket, nor the sentence. There is nothing in the charge which alleges that the knife was possessed for any purpose: because of the very nature of the flick knife, mere possession is the offence. 6. The appeal is dismissed. (A R Wright) Deputy Judge of the Court of First Instance High Court Representation: Mr Vincent Wong, GC of Department of Justice, for the Respondent The Appellant, in person PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT [Content_Types].xml _rels/.rels theme/theme/themeManager.xml K Y, sQ}# theme/theme/theme1.xml $O}) Xp90 +PHI| PP yu 9xu5 fs+W VF7H q=. 8}d- qyI@ j!Q_ jyV` |PZ+ T ""p < 4V O&x$ A8>v ;EUC n 8r *~P(5 .}x E /,EE\} theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.rels 5 6?$Q K(M&$R(.1 [Content_Types].xmlPK _rels/.relsPK theme/theme/themeManager.xmlPK theme/theme/theme1.xmlPK theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.relsPK <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?> <a:clrMap xmlns:a="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/main" bg1="lt1" tx1="dk1" bg2="lt2" tx2="dk2" accent1="accent1" accent2="accent2" accent3="accent3" accent4="accent4" accent5="accent5" accent6="accent6" hlink="hlink" folHlink="folHlink"/> Windows User Normal.dotm Windows User Microsoft Office Word Title Microsoft Word 97-2003 Document MSWordDoc Word.Document.8