HKSAR v. LI SHENG
The false date of birth is a material particular that goes to establish identity so the travel document was properly found to be false; there were no exceptional circumstances to justify reducing or suspending the sentences, therefore the convictions and concurrent 7 month sentences were upheld.
- Citation
- HKSAR v. LI SHENG
- Parties
- Appellant: Appellant; Respondent: Respondent (Prosecution)
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 8 December 2005
- Case Number
- HCMA1019/2005
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Immigration Offences / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence (high Court)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed in full
- Legal Topics
- False Travel Document, Possession of False Instrument, Sentencing, Material Particular
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Appellant
Appellant
Respondent (Prosecution)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Immigration Offences / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence (high Court)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a false date of birth on a travel document is a material particular rendering the document false under the Immigration Ordinance
- 2 Whether the sentence of 7 months imprisonment was manifestly excessive or should be suspended given lack of intent to use the false document
Ratio Decidendi
The false date of birth is a material particular that goes to establish identity so the travel document was properly found to be false; there were no exceptional circumstances to justify reducing or suspending the sentences, therefore the convictions and concurrent 7 month sentences were upheld.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed in full
Orders
- Appeal against conviction dismissed
- Appeal against sentence dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment