PACIFIC CROWN ENTERPRISES LTD v. MAN YU ON AND OTHERS
The Tribunal accepted the expert valuations and condition reports, found the applicant met the statutory ownership threshold and had taken reasonable steps to acquire the minority interest on fair and reasonable terms, concluded redevelopment was justified on grounds of age and state of repair because repair costs and functional obsolescence made repair economically unjustifiable, and therefore granted an order for compulsory sale with the reserve price set at the assessed RDV of HKD 292,000,000, appointed trustees and endorsed sale particulars and a 6-year completion timetable.
- Citation
- PACIFIC CROWN ENTERPRISES LTD v. MAN YU ON AND OTHERS
- Parties
- Applicant: Applicant; 1st Respondent: 1st Respondent; 2nd Respondent: 2nd Respondent
- Court
- Lands Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 12 April 2013
- Case Number
- LDCS32000/2011
- Procedural Posture
- Compulsory Sale Under Land (compulsory Sale for Redevelopment) Ordinance (cap. 545) / Determination and Orders Following Trial (judgment)
- Outcome
- Order for compulsory sale granted under Cap. 545; sale by public auction authorized; trustees appointed; reserve price fixed; redevelopment timetable imposed; costs order nisi (no order as to costs).
- Legal Topics
- Compulsory Sale, Redevelopment Justification (age/state of Repair), Valuation (euv and Rdv), Appointment of Trustees, Reserve Price for Auction, Costs
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Applicant
Applicant
1st Respondent
1st Respondent
2nd Respondent
2nd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Compulsory Sale Under Land (compulsory Sale for Redevelopment) Ordinance (cap. 545) / Determination and Orders Following Trial (judgment)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether applicant met statutory ownership threshold to apply (>=90%)
- 2 Whether applicant took reasonable steps to acquire remaining undivided shares
- 3 Whether redevelopment is justified on grounds of age or state of repair
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal accepted the expert valuations and condition reports, found the applicant met the statutory ownership threshold and had taken reasonable steps to acquire the minority interest on fair and reasonable terms, concluded redevelopment was justified on grounds of age and state of repair because repair costs and functional obsolescence made repair economically unjustifiable, and therefore granted an order for compulsory sale with the reserve price set at the assessed RDV of HKD 292,000,000, appointed trustees and endorsed sale particulars and a 6-year completion timetable.
Court Disposition
Order for compulsory sale granted under Cap. 545; sale by public auction authorized; trustees appointed; reserve price fixed; redevelopment timetable imposed; costs order nisi (no order as to costs).
Orders
- Apportionment ratio for 2nd Respondent's property fixed at 3.6277% under s10(3) and Part 3 of Schedule 1 of the Ordinance
- All undivided shares in the Lots to be sold by public auction for redevelopment of the Lots
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment