TSE TSZ CHONG v. LAW SZE MAN
Leave to appeal refused because applicant failed to show on the balance of probabilities that she is likely to obtain substantial damages; the 439 days of sick leave lack sufficient objective support and expert/Board confirmation, making the $80,000 interim payment sought likely to risk overpayment; $20,000 was a reasonable interim award.
- Citation
- TSE TSZ CHONG v. LAW SZE MAN
- Parties
- Applicant: Applicant; Respondent: Respondent
- Court
- District Court
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 10 November 2014
- Case Number
- DCEC619/2014
- Procedural Posture
- Interim Payment Application / Application for Leave to Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Interim Payment, Leave to Appeal, Estimation of Damages, Sick Leave, Post Concussion Syndrome, Employees Compensation Ordinance S.10(2)
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Applicant
Applicant
Respondent
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Interim Payment Application / Application for Leave to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave to appeal should be granted
- 2 Proper test for ordering interim payment (likelihood of success and substantial damages)
- 3 Weight to be given to multiple sick leave certificates totaling 439 days
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to appeal refused because applicant failed to show on the balance of probabilities that she is likely to obtain substantial damages; the 439 days of sick leave lack sufficient objective support and expert/Board confirmation, making the $80,000 interim payment sought likely to risk overpayment; $20,000 was a reasonable interim award.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal refused
Orders
- Leave to appeal refused
- Costs of this application to the respondent, to be taxed if not agreed, with certificate for counsel
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment