GOOD FAITH PROPERTIES LTD AND OTHERS v. CIBEAN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LTD
The Costs Order made at the final determination after a full trial is a final order for the purposes of Rule 30B(2) and therefore the 28-day time limit applies; wasted costs orders are distinct because they target legal representatives (not parties) and are specifically listed in Rule 30E, but that listing does not imply all other costs orders are interlocutory.
- Citation
- GOOD FAITH PROPERTIES LTD AND OTHERS v. CIBEAN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LTD
- Parties
- Applicant: Applicants; Respondent: Respondent
- Court
- Lands Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 20 February 2014
- Case Number
- LDCS42000/2011
- Procedural Posture
- Leave to Appeal (costs Order) / Hearing on Time Limit for Leave to Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal by the respondent is not out of time; the Costs Order is a final order for time-limit purposes.
- Legal Topics
- Interlocutory Vs Final Order, Time Limit for Leave to Appeal, Wasted Costs, Statutory and Rule Interpretation
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Applicants
Applicant
Respondent
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal (costs Order) / Hearing on Time Limit for Leave to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Costs Order made on 11 November 2013 is interlocutory or final for the purpose of computing the time limit to apply for leave to appeal
- 2 Whether the respondent's application for leave to appeal filed on 9 December 2013 was out of time
- 3 Proper interpretation of Section 12(1) and (3) of the Lands Tribunal Ordinance and Rules 30B and 30E of the Lands Tribunal Rules
Ratio Decidendi
The Costs Order made at the final determination after a full trial is a final order for the purposes of Rule 30B(2) and therefore the 28-day time limit applies; wasted costs orders are distinct because they target legal representatives (not parties) and are specifically listed in Rule 30E, but that listing does not imply all other costs orders are interlocutory.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal by the respondent is not out of time; the Costs Order is a final order for time-limit purposes.
Orders
- Respondent's application for leave to appeal is not out of time
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment